Dkc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2012
- Messages
- 19,993
- Reaction score
- 28,119
You can always switch back. We need a minimum of four hardcore supporters in our camp.I was initially but have now switched sides
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
You can always switch back. We need a minimum of four hardcore supporters in our camp.I was initially but have now switched sides
So you are 100% certain we can get promotion with just one or two more points? I'm not.Fixed that for you
I really am a splitter, as I can see and understand both sides argument. The joys of the English languageYou can always switch back. We need a minimum of four hardcore supporters in our camp.
100 per cent certainty doesn't come into it. The question is: what is the most points it it possible for us to still need to add to our total in order to confirm promotion? And given that the teams behind us currently trail by 7 points and 8 points respectively with (a maximum of) 9 points left for them to play for, the answer to that is 3.So you are 100% certain we can get promotion with just one or two more points? I'm not.
Nobody's arguing about the maths, this is semantics. "We still need a minimum of 3 points" suggests that there is a situation in which we might still need more than 3 points and, barring a random points deduction, that simply isn't the case.Can't believe I'm doing this...
Luton might win all their remaining games. If they do:
0 points won't be enough for us
1 point won't be enough for us
2 points might be enough for us depending on goal difference.
3 points will definitely be enough
In order to guarantee promotion from the current position we need a minimum of 3 points to do so.
All you maximum sheep are speculating on Luton or Boro's future results, team minimum is all about what United do.![]()
I love semantics meNobody's arguing about the maths, this is semantics. "We still need a minimum of 3 points" suggests that there is a situation in which we might still need more than 3 points and, barring a random points deduction, that simply isn't the case.
The question is 'what is the fewest number of points needed to guarantee promotion for the Blades if Luton win all their games. That number is 85. Yes, we could get promoted on 82 or 83 but that's not guaranteed. So the minimum number of points needed is 85. Of course ,86 or 87 also guarantees promotion, but the minimum points needed is 85.100 per cent certainty doesn't come into it. The question is: what is the most points it it possible for us to still need to add to our total in order to confirm promotion? And given that the teams behind us currently trail by 7 points and 8 points respectively with (a maximum of) 9 points left for to play for, the answer to that is 3.
"We have 12 points to play for, we need to obtain 3 out of those 12 to guarantee promotion"I love semantics me
We have 12 points to play for, we need to obtain a minimum of 3 out of those 12 to guarantee promotion. I don't think the word maximum is even applicable in describing it.
I suspect this isn't going to be solved![]()

As we always used to get told when sitting exams, make sure that you read the question properly. The article says:-
“Sheffield need a maximum of 3 points from their final four games to secure promotion back to the Premier League”
There is no reference to “guaranteeing” promotion and hence “maximum” is correct, as it’s use in this context is “at most”.
View attachment 158516
Best thread I’ve ever started…..It's bonky madness all this![]()
'Securing' promotion is the same as 'guaranteeing' promotion.As we always used to get told when sitting exams, make sure that you read the question properly. The article says:-
“Sheffield need a maximum of 3 points from their final four games to secure promotion back to the Premier League”
There is no reference to “guaranteeing” promotion and hence “maximum” is correct, as it’s use in this context is “at most”.
View attachment 158516
Best thread I’ve ever started…..![]()
You know the score...You can always switch back. We need a minimum of four hardcore supporters in our camp.
My parents used to talk about a trip across the Penines in a Riley in the early 60’s when my mother was leaning out of the passenger window sweeping snow off the windscreen so that my dad could see!My dad used the drive lorry chassis without cabs from Bedford back to Sheffield in the 50s, complete with goggles!
My mum was quite little, a lot smaller than Mrs Numpty's mum. Therefore my mum was Mini-mum, and Mrs Numpty's mum was Maxi-mum. Simples, as they say.When I was 12 my dad bought an Austin Maxi. Whenever my mum drove it we used to call her maximum. Hope that helps.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?