Baxter is certainly a classy player for this league,there should be no one doubting that really, but they will do.How people continue to think he's fat astonishes me. He'd had a poor game? Unbelievable. The vast majority of our fans can't spot quality and can only see obvious contributions. This is why many think Scougall is better than Baxter (he's far worse) because he's busy and runs about and is quick so fans notice it more despite the fact that in reality he's contributing less. Same applied last year where the majority saw Murphy as the better of our two wingers (both class, Flynn edged it last year) because of Murphy's pace he's more obviously good. Admittedly that's a weaker example than Baxter V Scougall.
As far as him giving the ball away I haven't seen it myself but if he does it's more often than not because of a lack of options or people not being turned on to the opportunitys and runs he is.
The thing i don't agree with though is you saying he's miles better than Scouggs.Scouggs is a completely different kind of player,who brings different attributes to the game.Baxter ain't going to run at anybody,where as Scouggs will,but that doesn't mean Scouggs is better,it just means he can do something different to Baxter
I think what some people get fixated to is what Pinchy reffered to in another post.The certain area of pitch they play in or somewhere along them lines.Just because they play behind the striker doesn't mean they have to play the same role or stay in that position,they should be able to do other things.
Another thing i don't agree with,is you saying Flynny was better than Murphy last year