It's just like watching ....Holland in 74!? Olle's day out in Birkenhead

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Ollessendro

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,024
Reaction score
987
Ollessendro came away from his first trip to Prenton Park with mixed emotions as Sheffield United drew 1-1 with Tranmere Rovers. The Blades took a first half lead through the unlikely source of Nick Montgomery, but this was cancelled out with 10 minutes to go by substitute Joss Labadie. The spoils were shared in a mixed game, with two very different halves. Danny Wilson’s side lost their 100% record, kept their unbeaten record and remain as one of the pacesetters in the third division.

Team

Wilson made the enforced change of bringing Doyle into the team and chose to play Williamson ahead of Mendez Laing. It was essentially the same team that finished the game on Tuesday, with the exception of Slew keeping his place upfront (Bogdanovic).

------------- SS

Lowton Maguire Collins Lescinel

Williamson* Doyle Monty Quinn*

-------- Slew Cresswell

* Quinn and Williamson seemed to interchange wings and Quinn spent a large proportion of the game on the right (and vice versa) as well and drifting inside.

Match

United started the game brightly and made the early going backed by the impressive support. They made their intentions clear early on, getting the ball on the ground and trying to pass it around. A good flowing move resulted in Quinn firing straight at the keeper. United looked the superior team, as they dominated possession and controlled the game. However, I remember few chances early on and do not remember keeper Fon Williams being tested.

Tranmere had a few half chances early on, as they got out of the blocks quickly. Devaney fired across goal, Showumni headed over when under pressure by Maguire and McChrystal volleyed straight down Simmonsen’s throat.

There a shocking tackle on Stephen Quinn that could (and should) have resulted in a red card. Now I am partisan, I was a long way away and I saw it in real time (no replay on the football league show) but infront of the dug out Quinn was pole axed by Devaney. It seemed to me that the players studs were up and he was late. Quinn was hurt and received treatment for 5 minutes. In the modern game it seemed it should have been a straight red, but the referee opted for a yellow. Wilson certainly seemed to think it should have been a red also when asked in his post match interview.

Tranmere carried on in the same vein throughout the early stages. United looked to get the ubiquitous Quinn on the ball and Tranmere responded by cynically hacking at him. Another player (Welsh I think) was given the yellow card after the a late challenge left Quinn on the deck again. The referee seemed to let several fouls go and opted not to book Rovers players for offences that seemed to be worthy of a yellow. Quinn broke away down the left hand side and the referee opted to have a word with Robinson. After his lunge at Quinn missed both ball and man. Robinson was getting himself involved in everything and opted to roll around the floor whenever there was contact and reacted angrily to United players touching him. This seemed to be Tranmere’s game plan and in addition to the cynical, continuous fouling they made a meal of every United tackle/challenge/foul and tried to get United players wound up and booked.

United then had a decent spell and forced a few corners. The Tranmere keeper looked dodgy as. Lescinel should have done better with a heqder and next there was ping pong in the Tranmere area.
Despite Tranmere’s cynical aspects, they enjoyed a good spell of football. I was surprised by how well they passed it around and how comfortable they looked on the ball. After seeing out United’s early dominance Tranmere came back into the game. A smooth passing move resulted in a shot straight at Simmonsen. The next move resulted in the best chance of the game. Rovers caught United on the counter (after Montgomery had been robbed) and broke down the left hand side. They had numbers forward as they the United players were pulled towards the ball. A long cross to the back post went over Lescinel and was met powerfully by Akin, only for Simmonsen to save with his feet. It was a free header, but from a tight angle. He did everything right and headed the ball on target. However Simmonsen had rushed out and close the angle. He managed to get his feet in the way and the ball went out for a corner. The United keeper saved a certain goal and kept United level. Simmonsen made another save when the striker (Showumi?) got in front of Collins and headed goal bound. The Blades keeper was well placed and caught the ball easily.

It seemed the game was going to be a stalemate at half time when the Blades took the lead through a goal worthy of winning a game. Sheffield United captain Nick Montgomery gave his team the lead with an absolute screamer. Lescinel and Slew combined and the young striker did well down the left hand side and ran towards the by line. He passed the ball inside to Quinn, who took a touch and laid it to MONTGOMERY. The Blades midfielder smacked an unstoppable right footed strike into the corner from over 30 yards. The ball was there to be hit, but no one expected to see such as thunderbolt. It was a goal reminiscent of Arrie Hahn’s pearler (for Holland) against Italy in the 1978 world cup.
United went into half time leading what had been quite an entertaining contest.

The second half was not the same standard as the first, as United took their foot of the gas (like Holland in the 1974 world cup final) and Tranmere resorted more direct tactics. The Blades struggled to get going and sat back on their lead. Rovers had given up their footballing philosophy and resulted to bombarding the United area with high balls. The competition turned ugly, as an aerial bombardment from the Merseyside team ensued.

Tranmere were starting to control the game, as United failed to get any sort of foothold in the second half. Tranmere brought on two substitutes (both big lads) and continued to lump it forward. Collins and Maguire brilliantly dealt with the long balls and won everything in the air. They were backed by a confident Simmonsen who’s handling was excellent. There were no signs of nerves as the United goalie held onto some high crosses and shots/headers. Although Simmonsen was the busier keeper, he was not really troubled and I only remember a few tame shots/headers at goal.
Tranmere had a strong appeal for a penalty turned down when a cross hit Lowton. It was too far for me to see what happened, but the Tranmere fans on the left hand side (to us) and the fans behind United’s goal (the other end to us) were incensed. No smoke without fire? It did not seem like a handball to me (from 100 yards away) but it was a big appeal.

Despite the home team rarely threatening, I felt a goal was coming. Rovers were eventually rewarded for all their pressure with 10 minutes to go when substitute Joss Labadie headed home. The goal was a cheap one and Danny Wilson will not be happy with the defending. United switched off when Tranmere had a corner on the left. It was taken quickly to the unmarked left back Buchanan. He took his time before crossing onto the head of the big, black substitute. The United defence was unorganised and it was a free header. He buried it and gave Simmonsen no chance. It was disappointing in many ways. We switched off, we did not pressure quick enough and a big guy was left all on his own to head home.

The home crowd finally seemed to wake up as they urged their team forward to try and get a winner. However it was United who had the best chance to win the game. It was the Blades players that finally woke up and started to apply pressure. They passed it around neatly and attacked with urgency. Creswell had a golden opportunity to win the game and will feel he should have done better. He gambled and seemed to latch onto a horrific backpass, but his effort was weak and the keeper gathered. I am not sure if he was a yard short of pace or if he misjudged how much time he had. As he got close to the ball he went to ground. Sliding, he was unable to get power behind the shot and the keeper saved. Cresswell lay head in hands for 30 seconds and I am sure he knows he missed a fantastic chance to keep United’s 100% record.

The game closed out without further incident other than the cynical Robinson being subbed before he was sent off (for the bleeding goalscorer). Quinn was booked after the Tranmere midfielder body checked Lowton and Quinn retaliated. ? Was lucky to stay on the pitch (he should have been booked first half and picked a booking up during the second half). He was subbed immediately.

Crimes against hoof

Today’s crime against hoof goes to Nick Montgomery for his wonder strike. It was a beautiful strike that belonged in a 70’s Holland world cup team game.

Simmonsen deserves a mention and also Collins. Simmo tries to roll the ball out on all occasions and Collins is almost always an option. As well as distributing well, Collins often advances out of defence and starts off united attacks.

Crimes against football

Today’s crime against football goes to Tranmere Rovers and particularly Robinson. Rovers, a decent passing side were just pure cynical and very dirty. They singled out Quinn and nailed him on two or 3 occasions. They dove at every opportunity and did their best to get United players booked for the slightest bit of contact. This was summed up by the midfielder Andy Robinson. He is talented and good on the ball. However he should have been sent off for several wild lunges. Not only that put he spent more time on the ball with theatrics that would have only been bettered in Stratford Upon Avon. Additionally, he retaliated a couple of times and was constantly moaning at the referee.

For United the crime against football has to be given to Harry Maguire. I like Maguire and he is a rock solid defender. He dealt with everything in the air and the 18 year did not look out of depth at all. However his distribution was shocking. He aimless hoofed the ball on countless occasions yesterday. His cross field aimless punts lead to us losing possession and in the second half immediately put us under pressure. I am impressed by the way that Simmo rolls the ball out to the defenders, but Maguire often just whacks (or sometimes floats) the ball down the pitch and gives the ball straight back to the other team.

Men of steel

Collins and Maguire deserve credit for assured defensive performances. They dealt with pretty much everything in the air and put in a solid 90 minutes. They are starting to gel and although very similar players, they are forming a partnership.

Montgomery deserves a mention for his wonder goal and a decent performance. He offered little going forward, other than his goal, but was solid and strong in the tackle. He broke up a lot of their attacks and did a lot of hassling and harrying.

Ollessendro’s man of steel yesterday was Steve Simmonsen. After a poor showing during the week he put in a very good performance. He dealt with high balls, held onto everything and made some very good saves. A lot of this was the basics (and things he is expected and indeed paid to do) but after Tuesday I thought he showed real character. He was confident and self assured. A steely keeping performance.

United

Mixed bag really. A game of two halves. In the first half we looked the better side and outplayed Tranmere for periods. We were comfortable on the ball and passed I around well. Again, we built from the back and were patient. We looked to get talented players like Quinn and Williamson on the ball whenever possible. However despite controlling possession we did not create a lot of chances. I do not remember us testing their keeper and it took a wonder goal to give us the lead.

Something has to be said about how dirty Tranmere Roverswere. They really roughed us up. A caller on Praise and Grumble said ‘if the ref had done his job properly and protected our players, then we would have won the game’. I find it hard to disagree. They could have been down to 10, maybe even 9, men by half time with their rash and persistent fouling.

The second half United were poor and looked second best for long parts. We sat back on the lead and never really threatened the home side. I do not remember their keeper making a save (other than from Cresswell late on). Credit should be given to Tranmere for pegging us back. They bombarded us with high balls. The problem for me was we had no outlet. We really struggled to hold onto possession and they kept coming back at us. This was partly because we kept clearing our lines (i.e. hoofing it away), partly because they pressured us well and partly because we could not get Williamson or Quinn on the ball (or get it to Cresswell’s feet). We were guilty of giving possession away through sloppy passes and the game was screaming for a player to put their foot on the ball and pass it to a red and white shirt, or simply hold on to it.

It was a solid away point, but I think we could have done better. Yet again we did not seem to get out of second gear and only in the last 10 minutes did we show really urgency (too little, too late). The team is still gelling and is a work in progress. We remain unbeaten, yet are far from being spectacular. If you had offered 10 points from the first 4 games I would have snatched your hand off (and given you a big sloppy kiss too!?).

Tranmere

What a horrible, dirty, cynical and cheating side. Diving, moaning and fouling on the first half. They put in some horrendous tackles. Studs up, nowhere near the ball and late. Quinn was lucky not to be hospitalised. They somehow kept 11 players on the pitch and their diving, winding up and general unsporting behaviour carried on throughout the game.

All the above said, they can play. They passed the ball around well in the first half and had several chances. They made Simmonsen work hard and would have felt unlucky to go in one down. The funny thing is that they got their joy from being direct. Their goal was well worked, but it was their relentless pressure that lead to it. They seemed to be slowly wearing us down with their aerial bombardment, but then just as we seemed to be holding out they scored. United were sleeping, but it was good quick thinking and a well take corner.

Wilson

I cannot grumble with his tactics today. He started the team that many would have started, giving starts to Doyle and Williamson on merit. I can understand him playing Monty and Doyle in the middle away from home, if he has creativity in the Williamson and Quinn. However Quinn was kicked out of the game and Williamson was disappointing.

I thought Wilson might have changed things earlier (hindsight is a wonderful thing) as it clearly was not working in the second half. We could not hold onto the ball and gave possession away cheaply. He introduced Porter who won a few headers, but did not have much impact. Perhaps Mendez-Laing could have stretched their defence with his pace, although Slew had little joy all afternoon.

I am sure that Wilson (and Barlow) will be criticised for being too defensive. It did seem we had more quality and that if we stepped it up (like the latter stages against Walsall) then we would easily beat Tranmere. Wilson opted for us to be solid and professional. Perhaps we should be beating teams like this, but many could argue this is a good away point. Wilson was certainly pleased with it. In his Radio interview he said ‘if you would have offered me 1-1 before I would have taken it and being pleased’. I think I am in agreement with that.

Atmosphere

All the talk around the ground, in the pubs in Birkenhead and in the Cowshed stand was about how the we :heart: hoof brigade had scored a small victory earlier that day. There was talk of the injustice of Ollessendro’s satirical thread being closed by the administrators. The we :heart: hoof brigade could be seen at points around Prenton Park drinking lager and talking about how the KOC’s thread had been closed. It was a big victory for the hoof lovers. A big albino gorilla was spotted telling his real ale loving brothers to be patient and that the we :heart: hoof brigade had won the battle and not the war. Danny Wilson’s team silenced the hoof loving lager louts with some spell binding, passing football in the first half. The Blades playing like Holland in 1974 soon silenced the ‘direct’ footballer lovers and there were no shouts of ‘up an attem’, ‘gerr it forrard’ or ‘stop fucking abart beack theer n knock it long’.

Not sure what the United following was, but I guess around 2k. We really got behind the team and it was a cauldron of noise. For the second time this season there has been close to as many United fans as there being home fans. We really got behind the team and made a lot of noise. Fantastic support through the first half.

Half time was excellent, as I went down for a beer. The chant of ‘his name is Nick, Montgomery ….. he has a touch like a rapist …. ‘ rang around the Blades end. There was a real carnival atmosphere and feeling of togetherness. At half time we really were buzzing.
Second half the support tailed off a little (with the Blades performance) but we were still like the home team (other than a 5 minute spell after they scored).
 

Player ratings

SIMMONSEN 7.5/10 – an assured performance. He made some crucial saves and did the basics well. He did well in the air (under pressure) and held onto some tricky efforts. His distribution was very good and he tried to use the defence by rolling it out to them at every opportunity.

Lowton 6.5/10 – a steady performance. Did ok defensive, but did not get forward as well as he has done in previous matches.

Lescinel 6.5/10 – I like Jean Francois, though he does switch off at times. He defended pretty well, but on a few occasions gave his man too much space. If he can concentrate for a full 90 minutes he could be a very good player. He offers a lot going forward and supported Quinn/Williamson well. He is athletic, quick and decent on the ball. He bombed down the left a few times and gave the Tranmere defenders some real problems.

Maguire 7/10 – a rock solid defensive performance. He is good in the air, strong and confident. He is gelling with Collins and looks more self assured every game. However his distribution from the back is very poor. He knocks the ball long aimlessly way too often. His favourite is the cross field punt/float to no one. People may think I am being harsh, but he does good work by winning the ball or dropping short at goal kicks and then hoofs it to the opposition. He needs to work on this.

Collins 7/10 – He is really growing in stature and looks a completely different player that last season. He wins a lot of headers and generally deals with high balls (albeit not very elegantly). He was solid yesterday. I am also really impressed by the way he uses the ball. He drops short at every opportunity and took the ball of Simmonsen on several occasions. He rarely hoof’s it and opts for short, simple passes to other United players (be them defenders or midfielders). My only slight criticism is he is a little slow. On a couple of occasions yesterday he was slightly behind his man or let his man steel half a yard and get in front of him.

Quinn 5.5/10 – He was singled out and maliciously kicked from pillar to post. Unfortunately it seemed to work. First half he had some good touches and was involved in most things United did. He worked hard and was ubiquitous. In the second half he rarely got on the ball and was fairly anonymous. He also seemed to be out of position a lot. He was out of the right for large parts (perhaps under Wilson’s instruction) and kept drifting inside. I am a fan of his work rate, but wonder if he was trying to do too much yesterday (he might have been better just sticking to his job, trusting his team mates and not trying to do everyone else’s). People will think I am being harsh (particularly as he kicked out of the game) but he has set his own high standards.

Montgomery 6.5/10 – did the basics well and scored a wonder goal. He did his typical hassling and harrying and breaking up of attacks (of both teams!?). He offered protection to the back 4, without really offering a lot going forward (apart from a brilliant goal!).

Doyle 4/10 – thought he struggled yesterday and always looked a yard off the pace. He tried hard, but often gave away possession in frustration (silly fouls). He tried to get his foot in, but seemed to be mostly chasing shadows. With Monty doing the defensive work, I was looking for Doyle to offer something going forward. However his distribution was poor and he was mostly anonymous. He did little to nothing to hold onto the ball and take the pressure off us in the second half (but neither did his team mates).

Williamson 4.5/10 – was largely anonymous and did not really get involved in the game. He is not a winger and also seemed to be out left a lot of the match. He showed some good touches early on and got his foot in a few times. However he did very little as the game wore on and created very little (what he is in there for).

Cresswell 4.5/10 – Felt Cresswell was just a yard short all afternoon. He had less joy than previous games in the air and things did not come off for him. That said his work rate was excellent and he never gave up. His quick thinking and persistency got him his vital chance (that he usually buries) but he fluffed it. He will have days like this, but I hope (and think) he will have more days like the 3 previous games than this one.

Slew 4/10 – Never really got involved. On the few occasions he got the ball I thought he wasted it. He was too easily outmuscled or made a bad decision. I would have liked him to have tried to use his pace more. I would also have liked united to try and use his pace more.

Subs: Porter came on and won a few headers, but did little else. It was not easy for him, as he saw little of the ball and when it came toward him it was at head height. Mendez Laing came on with a few minutes to spare and did little worth noting.

Ref I would not normally do a report on the ref, but this pillock deserved a mention. He let the home team off big time for some horrific challenges. I know I keep banging on about this, but they were shockers. He could have easily have sent off a couple of their players. He also fell for Tranmere’s cynical diving and play acting and gave harsh free kicks against United and even booked a few of our players. I thought he let Rovers bully United a little bit. He was also very finicky and kept pulling up for any contact and rarely let the game run.
The rest of the league

It is early days, but from what I have seen we are in with a shout. I am not getting carried away, but the division is not of a particularly high quality. Brentford, who were deemed as ‘extremely poor’ have actually had their best start in years and smashed Leyton Orient 5 nil yesterday. They are now a point behind us. My point? We should perhaps give United and Wilson credit for a dream start. Unbeaten after 4 and with 10 points is impressive. Sure we will know more when we play Notts County, Wednesday, Charlton, MK Dons and Huddersfield. But the division is a fairly mediocre one and a team that is well organised, professional and has a bit of quality could do well.

Ale

There was little good ale knocking about in the pubs in Birkenhead, despite Merseyside being a good place for real ale. Not a single Camra pub is within about 5 miles of the ground. We ended up in a pub full of Everton, Liverpool and Tranmere fans close to the ground (the High House). They were doing Marston’s English Pale Ale a slightly bitter, light pale ale with a lingering hoppy after taste. Not the best ale I have ever had, but streets ahead of the Stella, Carling and Carlsberg they also had on tap.

Fortunately I had been for a few jars on the Friday night :) I was in the Bay Horse in Scholes (edge of Rotherham/Sheffield – close to Thorpe Hesley/Chapeltown) which is an excellent, traditional local pub. It won Camra local pub of the year last year and has won numerous local awards. The ale is well kept and there are 6 hand pumps.

I enjoyed trying a Sheffield Crucible (a nice, medium ale/bitter) and a (Skipton brewed) Golden Pippin (a light, pale ale that had a slightly fruity taste). The best two ales I had were Kelham Island Pale Rider (strong in volume, yet a light pale ale – national pale ale of the year in 2004) and the classic Timothy Taylors Landlord (delicious, creamy, golden and fairly strong bitter – winner of tons of awards).

Ollessendro’s final thoughts

I thought the nutter on Radio Sheffield’s Praise or Grumble said it well when he said it was ‘mixed, a praise and a grumble …. A prumble’. He then went on to give a simile of Holland in the 74 world cup final. This may have been over the top, but there were similarities. We looked good, but did not get out of second gear. We took our foot off the gas and got punished. We probably could have taken all 3 points, but we did not. The bottom line is we came to a difficult place and got a result. Without being vintage we got a point and kept the momentum going. 10 points out of 12 is a dream start. If you had asked me if I would have taken a draw before kick off, I would have said yes. Disappointed we did not win? Of course. But pleased with the result and the start to the season? Abso-fucking-lutely.
 
Atmosphere

All the talk around the ground, in the pubs in Birkenhead and in the Cowshed stand was about how the we hoof brigade had scored a small victory earlier that day. There was talk of the injustice of Ollessendro’s satirical thread being closed by the administrators. The we hoof brigade could be seen at points around Prenton Park drinking lager and talking about how the KOC’s thread had been closed. It was a big victory for the hoof lovers. A big albino gorilla was spotted telling his real ale loving brothers to be patient and that the we hoof brigade had won the battle and not the war. Danny Wilson’s team silenced the hoof loving lager louts with some spell binding, passing football in the first half. The Blades playing like Holland in 1974 soon silenced the ‘direct’ footballer lovers and there were no shouts of ‘up an attem’, ‘gerr it forrard’ or ‘stop fucking abart beack theer n knock it long’.

Not sure what the United following was, but I guess around 2k. We really got behind the team and it was a cauldron of noise. For the second time this season there has been close to as many United fans as there being home fans. We really got behind the team and made a lot of noise. Fantastic support through the first half.

Half time was excellent, as I went down for a beer. The chant of ‘his name is Nick, Montgomery ….. he has a touch like a rapist …. ‘ rang around the Blades end. There was a real carnival atmosphere and feeling of togetherness. At half time we really were buzzing.
Second half the support tailed off a little (with the Blades performance) but we were still like the home team (other than a 5 minute spell after they scored).
why,seriously why ?
 
There are 13 mins of (extended) highlights on the Tranmere website. Anyone who has Blades player can log on. Funnily they don't show any of the bad challenges and rolling around on the floor. Appears I missed a few things. Decent footage though and you can hear the Blades fans. On their goal I think Porter was slow to react and should have been tighter on Buchanan. Possibly Lowton (who kicked the ball out for a corner) should have spotted it. Lowton did not need to give the corner away and a shout could have told him he had noone behind him. Then we fell asleep and the marking was awful. Noone with two yards of Labadie. Watching Cresswell's chance again, I think he did not realise how much time he had. He slid when he really did not need to. If he could have stayed on his feet he could have either shot or played in Doyle (who had done a good job of supporting him and would have had an open goal). Shame. If we'd nicked it then it would have been absolute robbery (bit of irony on Merseyside ;) ).
 
Tell me ollie, why besmirch a perfectly good post game report with this bollox "we :heart: hoof brigade", its gone beyond boring now, give it a quiet funeral and just keep to the match report, which i thought on the whole was succinct.
Maybe not how others saw it but gives people a decent view for those that couldn't/didn't go to the game then you go and make a complete fucking mockery of a good report with your pretend gang obsession.

ill wait for someone elses reports in future to avoid reading this drivel.

MunXy
 
Sorry to say the quite excellent report was ruined by all this hoof bollocks. It was never funny and has been proved by those championing this rapfa/ we love hoof rubbish that they really don't know or care for the opinions of others, make some odd assumptions. Just because you shout louder doesn't make you right.

Numerous threads have been closed in recent days, it's not a victory for a particular group, in my mind there is just one group - blades fans. Anytime that a thread gets closed is proof that things are getting daft. I used to enjoy contributing to this forum, sometimes we can have some good banter, but I'm entirely fed up with it all.

Such a shame really as I'm also enjoying the start to the season. Danny wilson is bang on target, making few errors and seems to be getting the best out of some players who were heavily criticised last season. Results are great, so not a lot to grumble about, despite my severe reservations and dislike of his appointment. it's still early days though.

I'm looking forward to seeing this new united for myself, I was looking forward to discussing this new united on here too with those who can make sensible posts, but it's getting very boring
 
All the talk around the ground, in the pubs in Birkenhead and in the Cowshed stand was about how the we :heart: hoof brigade had scored a small victory earlier that day. There was talk of the injustice of Ollessendro’s satirical thread being closed by the administrators.

Admittedly I wasnt there but I doubt you were the hot topic of conversation among Unitedites on match day.
 
Wow, how long did that take you to type?!!! Impressive.
 
Amazing - the P&G caller really labouring a tedious Holland metaphor remind me of you when I listened... and it was actually you!
 
How sad and:o
The report was reading ok, even if you agreed or disagreed with it. Although he has to mention his own name each time---ME, ME, ME. attitude.
Then we had this crap about 'Hoof'. Incidently a phrase brought to this forum by the MOP crew. (you can guess who they are). They love to try and bracket people because they hide in their own group because it it safest.
See if the ME, ME, ME, attitude gets this bumped or OLLEcised. (A phrase brought in by another poster because of the number of times the thread starter bumped his own threads).
If you dont like his posts you have the option of taking his little green peas away. Click on the star at the bottom of his name and details and you get the option of adding or taking away from someones reputation. Your choise of coarse.

PS how long do gorillas live:eek:
 
I should have known that the usual suspects would come wading in and throwing their toys out of the pram. I am guessing that when more of the usual suspects spait their dummies out and no doubt go complainining to the admins that a quite excellent match report (Swiss' words not mine) will be closed (and a possibly forum vacation may be headed my way). Little thought has been given to the time it took me to write this report for the benefit of people who did not go to the match, purely because a few sad individuals don't have a sense of humour. Why these posters who vehemently hate my posts/threads seem to follow me around like a fart under a blanket, unable to use the ignire function and with a lack of control to be able to not post on Ollessendro's threads is beyond me. I guess these boring individuals just want a tedious, uninteresting foruum. How about we concentrate on the report and make some comments about the match, Wilson or the players?
 
I should have known that the usual suspects would come wading in and throwing their toys out of the pram. I am guessing that when more of the 1 usual suspects spait their dummies out and no doubt go complainining to the admins that a quite excellent match report (Swiss' words not mine) will be closed (and a possibly forum vacation may be headed my way). Little thought has been given to the time it took me to write this report for the benefit of people who did not go to the match, 2 purely because a few sad individuals don't have a sense of humour. Why these posters who vehemently hate my posts/threads seem to follow me around like a fart under a blanket, unable to use the ignire function and with a lack of control to be able to not post on Ollessendro's threads is beyond me.
3 I guess these boring individuals just want a tedious, uninteresting foruum. 4 How about we concentrate on the report and make some comments about the match, Wilson or the players?

1. It seems like reading this, ther's only one spat dummy out. Whos reported you to admin?
2. If you keep writing the same thing that YOU find funny it becomes tedious after a while. (Q,what do you call a man with a number plate on his head? A, Reg). please consider it is only you that finds it continuously funny.
3. Its the same stuff that your writing that makes it boring and uninteresting.
4. So why didn't you? You spoiled your own good thread.

Did you notice that some praised your report and got annoyed at the other?
 

Amazing - the P&G caller really labouring a tedious Holland metaphor remind me of you when I listened... and it was actually you!

Was it really? The bloke on P&G sounded like a pompous twerp in love with the sound of his own voice, so how do you arrive at the conclusion it was Olle?
 
I think there is a growing, but small, band of I :heart: me(s) whose fondness for the sound of their own keyboard clattering is cluttering up some very good content with utter shite. Great report Olle, just cut the rest of the tripe.
 
I thought it was a great report ,right up to the last paragraph where the now mindnumbingly boring hoof brigade repetition reared it's tedious head and totally spoiled it

If you want to write about fictitious groups go and do it on the spinal tap forum
 
Keep reporting for those who cannot go and have the dubious pleasure of 'Radio Discuss anything but the match' to listen to.
From all the reports I have read my impression is that Tranmere were there to be beaten and United missed an opportunity to forge on.
It seems that we just do not have the player mix to give a full 90 minutes in any match and that personal decisions by the players are below par.
I hope that Wilson {a defensive interview} will be working on this.
On the Maguire issue I too am dissapointed in his distribution.....an issue which was not apparent in the academy at all.
 
We don't like hoof. We :heart: it.

Down with RAPTA :croc: :shark: :badger:

The Hoof Rebel Alliance are coming for you, and have declared a Fatwa on Olly as self appointed leader of CRAPTA

:fishbowl:

:tumbleweed:

:gallop:

We :heart: :foxy:
 
Sorry to say the quite excellent report was ruined by all this hoof bollocks. It was never funny and has been proved by those championing this rapfa/ we love hoof rubbish that they really don't know or care for the opinions of others, make some odd assumptions. Just because you shout louder doesn't make you right.

Numerous threads have been closed in recent days, it's not a victory for a particular group, in my mind there is just one group - blades fans. Anytime that a thread gets closed is proof that things are getting daft. I used to enjoy contributing to this forum, sometimes we can have some good banter, but I'm entirely fed up with it all.

Such a shame really as I'm also enjoying the start to the season. Danny wilson is bang on target, making few errors and seems to be getting the best out of some players who were heavily criticised last season. Results are great, so not a lot to grumble about, despite my severe reservations and dislike of his appointment. it's still early days though.

I'm looking forward to seeing this new united for myself, I was looking forward to discussing this new united on here too with those who can make sensible posts, but it's getting very boring

You're making a mountain out of a molehill pal. Numerous threads? Two aint it? Plenty of good banter on here. Just ignore the crap Swiss if you don't like it.

Plenty of chance to talk about football - I personally disagree with virtually everything you say about football (and admit am very amused every time you popast about Wilson) and of course we all try and take the piss out of eachother with a few exceptions where it gets a tad out of hand. I think everyone is enjoying the start to the term, I don't think we are much good and cannot succeed with so little pace, and use the 60 minutes against Walsall as evidence - others quite rightly say we won it. I don't think it can be a new United with Monty and Doyle in middle but as you say Danny is making it work - difference is the opposition are from what I have seen very shaky at the back when you pour men forward.
 
I thought it was a great report ,right up to the last paragraph where the now mindnumbingly boring hoof brigade repetition reared it's tedious head

This was also my view, though I wouldn't say it totally spoiled it for me. I Just skipped over that bit.

Olle - Having not seen the game, the effort you put in is greatly appreciated. Same goes for Deadbat and anyone else who takes the trouble to put together - for free and during their own time - such detailed reports.

Personally, I think the points Swiss, judge and others make are well merited. Clearly more people dislike the hoofball stuff than like it. But personally I would prefer what we got with this small bit of tedium than nothing at all.

And FWIW the criticisms of people who have not read your report or resort to personal attacks are not worth your time. Some of them have never contributed anything to this board save for criticism of other posters and a good match report with a bit if ill judged comedy in it is worth 1000 of their posts.
 
I should have known that the usual suspects would come wading in and throwing their toys out of the pram. I am guessing that when more of the usual suspects spait their dummies out and no doubt go complainining to the admins that a quite excellent match report (Swiss' words not mine) will be closed (and a possibly forum vacation may be headed my way).

Ollie, simple solution is just stick to the report rather than all of this Hoof/ Rapfa nonsense, its just shit and ruins an otherwise very detailed, very concise report. The odd thing is I like the Men of steel/ Crimes against football/ crimes against hoof parts. This forum needs to be kept in a way that ensures that the masses are content and keep this forum from being a BladesMad type forum. As I alluded to in my previous post on this thread, the opportunity to discuss our excellent form is less than appealing at the moment.
 
Good report, not overly concerned about Ollesendro's humour. Not sure why it causes so much friction?

When reading the paper if there is a headline that doesnt interest me I dont read it.

Anything that evokes a response is usually worth reading anyway.
 
Good report as per usual Olle. I'm not overly bothered about the hoof stuff in the middle of such posts, it's just when it's a full thread of it... even though admittedly I could ignore it.

Linz was right in her locking of the other thread though when she said it was a post that aimed to be divisive. Plus, it's always just a way of having sly digs at other posters and is irritating rather than offensive.

Anyway, thanks for the post. Ditto with Deader's efforts; they're always very much appreciated.
 
You're making a mountain out of a molehill pal. Numerous threads? Two aint it? Plenty of good banter on here. Just ignore the crap Swiss if you don't like it.

Plenty of chance to talk about football - I personally disagree with virtually everything you say about football (and admit am very amused every time you popast about Wilson) and of course we all try and take the piss out of eachother with a few exceptions where it gets a tad out of hand. I think everyone is enjoying the start to the term, I don't think we are much good and cannot succeed with so little pace, and use the 60 minutes against Walsall as evidence - others quite rightly say we won it. I don't think it can be a new United with Monty and Doyle in middle but as you say Danny is making it work - difference is the opposition are from what I have seen very shaky at the back when you pour men forward.

Perhaps I am Mic, but I just think its all getting very tedious.

As for Wilson:

Preseason - I've only posted based on his record/ history and what I thought was happening/ not happening/ should've been happening preseason.
Start of Season - I've not seen United play yet, so can't comment on his management other than what I've read and can only say that he seems to be doing well so far. Glad that those bits amuse you :)

The "new United" part was a little tongue in cheek, of course its not a new united, we still have the same team, he's just tweeked it (from what I can tell) to his way of playing and with the few additions he has been able to bring in. Far too early to tell just yet, but it could be that Wilson is a magician (getting the best out of excellent players like Quinn, Cressy and Monty - players which you detest) or that its a case of new broom sweeps clean etc. We'll see.
 
The problem is it's clapper/knocker, Rapka/Lager fans, We love hoofing/whatever...people get tired of the seemingly endless groups. If it was funny but repetitive (BeightonBlade was IMHO) then you'd let it slide, but when people refer to themselves as "executives" or even "the intelligentsia", people's patience and goodwill will invariably run a bit thin.

As others had said, good match report but the rest is just unnecessary and tedious.
 
can't understand the preoccupation with all of this hoof stuff.. it's a couple of lines in a two page report that olle has obviously put a lot of thought into.. just read the rest.. some of you have no sense of humour/irony whatsover.. just smirk and move on
btw i'm with mic on this .. the spine of our team is crap and we'll get found out sooner or later.. simmo.. dodgy.. collins.. worst player last year, still not convinced.. monty/doyle.. don't get me started.. cresswell.. great effort but too old to play four games in a row.

>excellent players like Quinn, Cressy and Monty
quinn perhaps, cressy sometimes but monty/doyle.. sorry they are clones of each other.. ooh monty scored a goal.. 'bout fucking time really
 
I think the chants of 'One Neil Warnock' echoing round Liverpool Lime Street station to the obvious displeasure of the bluenoses also warrants a mention :)
 

some of you have no sense of humour/irony whatsover

You know that not finding something funny... especially when replayed over and over and over again doesn't mean that someone doesn't have a sense of humour yeah?

And as much as I'm all for different interpretations of the word irony, I struggle to find any in Olle's humour.

That said, to reiterate. The report as usual was a good one and is much appreciated.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom