First of all, I agree with your overall position that Ched is an innocent man and is rightfully free to resume his career. I have absolutely no problem with SUFC signing him and I really hope he gets his fitness up and starts smashing goals in for us.
However, to use your own words, your argument here is “absolute bollocks”. The evidence was presented in court. A jury of 12 thought, on the balance of the evidence they’d seen, that he was guilty. That suggests that it was entirely reasonable for the CPS to bring the case to trial at the time based on the evidence they had. Further evidence has since cleared him of the crime and I’m pleased for him that he’s been able to clear his name. But that in no way means it was wrong for the CPS to bring the case in the first instance. You demonstrate a complete lack of understanding of the English Legal System with your cries of “clown”, “bollocks” etc. with absolutely no substance to your point.