Outgoing? Brewster

[Moan? Nope-I saw Longhorn]

Phones and social media have ended the art of actual conversation

ChatGPT (and others) will end the art of thinking

Aye
I’ve been musing about this all day and my conclusion is that yours is a really interesting question!:-

I don’t think AI chatbots will end the art of thinking. Instead, they might change how people think or approach problems. Here’s why:

• AI can help spark ideas and give quick answers, but critical thinking, creativity, and deep reflection are still very human skills.
• Thinking involves emotions, values, experiences, and intuition, which AI can’t fully replicate.
• People might rely on AI for some tasks, but many will still want to understand and explore ideas themselves.
• In fact, AI can be a tool to enhance thinking — like a partner for brainstorming or learning.

What do you think? Do you worry AI might make us lazy thinkers, or do you see it more as a helpful assistant?

 

[Blade58]

Aye
I’ve been musing about this all day and my conclusion is that yours is a really interesting question!:-

I don’t think AI chatbots will end the art of thinking. Instead, they might change how people think or approach problems. Here’s why:

• AI can help spark ideas and give quick answers, but critical thinking, creativity, and deep reflection are still very human skills.
• Thinking involves emotions, values, experiences, and intuition, which AI can’t fully replicate.
• People might rely on AI for some tasks, but many will still want to understand and explore ideas themselves.
• In fact, AI can be a tool to enhance thinking — like a partner for brainstorming or learning.

What do you think? Do you worry AI might make us lazy thinkers, or do you see it more as a helpful assistant?

I see it doing both tbh
I see it as a helpful assistant but also making us lazy.

Remember when calculators first hit the scene? It stopped pupils/students from being able to add up. I’d seen examples where even basic maths, such as adding two numbers together, kids automatically crunching it into a calculator because it become the norm and made them lazy. It stopped them thinking for themselves.

The introduction of smart phones and social media has made kids and even grown ups lose the art of conversation, again making us lazy

AI will be a great tool but there will be a flip side and you may be right in that the creative side and critical thinking side may change or evolve, but I’m more inclined to think it will, over time, disappear.

It seems with each new piece of technology introduced there’s a plus side and negative side

 

[Charlieblade]

AI is a tool that can rapidly gather a lot of information, processed it and then present it's own unique analysis of that information.
As individuals we can absorb that information and then draw our own conclusions and form our own opinions.

Find below how one AI gathered, analysed and drew it's own conclusion on how to present the information:


Rhian Brewster's Fit with Selles Tactics


Found 14 results


Thought for 30 seconds


Hmm, let's tackle this question about whether Rhian Brewster is a good fit for Ruben Selles' style at Sheffield United. First, I need to understand what the user is asking. They want to know if Brewster suits Selles' tactical approach. I found many search results, so I'll start by reviewing those.

Looking at the search results, Brewster's contract situation is critical. His deal expires on June 30, 2025, and negotiations are ongoing but there's a gap in valuations 124. That's context, but the main question is about his playing style under Selles.

Next, I should outline Selles' preferred tactics. The user's question implies we need to infer Selles' style since he's newly appointed. Among these search results, it mentions Selles was at Hull City, but there's no direct info on his tactics. However, 7 notes that Selles' Hull conceded a late goal, which might hint at high pressing, but it's speculative. I'll have to base this on general knowledge or indirect clues.

Brewster's versatility is highlighted in multiple articles. He played as a striker, attacking midfielder, and on the wings last season 14. His positional flexibility is a plus. His stats show 4 goals and 3 assists in 36 appearances, with 16 starts 4. His best performance was scoring the derby winner against Sheffield Wednesday 13, which shows he can deliver in big moments.

Injuries have been a recurring issue for Brewster, affecting his consistency 34. However, last season was his healthiest, allowing him to contribute more. His transformation into a deeper role or winger under Wilder 1 might align with a high-pressing system if Selles employs one.

The new manager's impact is uncertain. 2 mentions that Wilder's departure might affect Brewster's willingness to stay, but the contract offer remains. Selles hasn't commented yet, so his valuation of Brewster is unknown. The club's delay in securing his contract might indicate they see him as a squad player rather than essential 4

Comparing strengths and weaknesses: Brewster's work rate and versatility are assets. His injury history and inconsistent scoring (only 8 goals in 106 appearances) 34 are drawbacks. Selles might appreciate his pressing and adaptability but could be concerned about fitness and output.

will structure the answer by covering Brewster's contract status, playing style, tactical fit under Selles, and the unresolved factors like the new manager's plans. Highlighting his versatility and recent role changes under Wilder as potential alignment with high-pressing systems. Also, mention the financial aspect where losing him for free isn't a huge loss given his original fee is already sunk 24.

Need to ensure references are correctly cited. For example, Brewster's deeper role is in 1, stats in 4, injury history in 3. Also, note that Selles' appointment is recent, so his style isn't detailed in the search results, requiring some inference.

In conclusion, Brewster's flexibility and work rate could suit Selles if he values adaptable forwards, but his injury record and the new manager's unknown preferences leave questions. The contract situation adds urgency, but the fit is plausible if Selles prioritizes versatility.
Based on the available information regarding Rhian Brewster's attributes and Ruben Selles' tactical profile, Brewster appears to be a potential fit for Selles' system, though with some caveats. Here's a detailed analysis:

Note: The numbers are references to the site where the information was taken from.


Below is how it chose to present it's answer:

​

1. Positional Versatility:
   Brewster has evolved from a traditional striker (#9) into a multi-functional forward under Chris Wilder. Last season, he frequently operated as a deeper-lying playmaker, right/left winger, or attacking midfielder. This adaptability aligns with Selles' preference for fluid, dynamic attacking setups 14. His heatmaps and positional data show significant work rate in wide and transitional zones, fitting systems emphasizing width and interchangeability 511.
2. Work Rate and Pressing:
   Selles' systems (notably at Southampton and Hull City) often prioritize high pressing and defensive contribution from forwards. Brewster's physical strength and willingness to engage in defensive duties—evidenced by his 1.7 tackles per 90 minutes in the Championship—suit this approach. His transformation into a "team player" beyond pure goal-scoring was highlighted in Wilder's tactics 14.
3. Big-Moment Impact:
   Despite limited starts (16 in 36 appearances in 2024/25), Brewster delivered crucial goals, including a Steel City Derby winner and a playoff-push decider against Millwall. Selles values players who thrive under pressure, and Brewster's clutch performances demonstrate this trait 137.

​

1. Inconsistent Output:
   Brewster's goal contributions (4 goals, 3 assists last season) remain modest for a forward. His career at Sheffield United has been marred by injuries and fluctuating form, with only 8 goals in 106 total appearances. Selles may need a more prolific focal point unless Brewster is deployed purely as a facilitator 34.
2. Injury History:
   Recurrent hamstring issues have disrupted his momentum. Selles' high-intensity system could exacerbate injury risks if Brewster isn't fully fit 311.
3. Uncertain Contract Status:
   With Brewster's contract expiring on June 30, 2025, and negotiations stalled over wage demands, Selles may not view him as essential. The club's reluctance to urgently secure his extension suggests he is seen as a squad player rather than a core asset 124.

​

• Tactical Value: Brewster's positional flexibility allows Selles to experiment with formations (e.g., 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3) without requiring multiple signings.
• Cost-Efficiency: Retaining Brewster on reduced terms could free funds for other reinforcements.
• Project Fit: At 25, Brewster fits the profile of a player who could thrive under a developmental coach like Selles—if he stays fit 24.

​

Brewster aligns stylistically with Selles' emphasis on versatility and work ethic but must overcome durability and productivity issues. His retention would offer tactical depth, but Selles is unlikely to build the attack around him unless his contract situation resolves soon. If released, Sheffield United's recruitment focus would shift toward a more reliable goal threat 14.

This might not be everyone's cup of tea. For me, it has saved me a lot of time trawling through the net and gave me it's analysis. I can then form my own opinion on what I agree or disagree with.

At the moment,it can still provide useful guidance. A great deal depends on the inputs made by the questioner, and the breadth of perspective allowed in the AI search?

 

[Charlieblade]

Aye
I’ve been musing about this all day and my conclusion is that yours is a really interesting question!:-

I don’t think AI chatbots will end the art of thinking. Instead, they might change how people think or approach problems. Here’s why:

• AI can help spark ideas and give quick answers, but critical thinking, creativity, and deep reflection are still very human skills.
• Thinking involves emotions, values, experiences, and intuition, which AI can’t fully replicate.
• People might rely on AI for some tasks, but many will still want to understand and explore ideas themselves.
• In fact, AI can be a tool to enhance thinking — like a partner for brainstorming or learning.

What do you think? Do you worry AI might make us lazy thinkers, or do you see it more as a helpful assistant?

I suspect your second bullet point has the hammer meeting the nail on the head. It remains to be seen how much human input anyone at the club had to inspire the most recent signings, and where the transfer fees and wages are found from?

It’s clear that human involvement is required in the decision making process. That would never expire, but it will always remain subjective.

 

[SouthStandGBlock]

Who's the zone man?

Wilf.

It's always Wilf

 

[Moan? Nope-I saw Longhorn]

Aye
I’ve been musing about this all day and my conclusion is that yours is a really interesting question!:-

I don’t think AI chatbots will end the art of thinking. Instead, they might change how people think or approach problems. Here’s why:

• AI can help spark ideas and give quick answers, but critical thinking, creativity, and deep reflection are still very human skills.
• Thinking involves emotions, values, experiences, and intuition, which AI can’t fully replicate.
• People might rely on AI for some tasks, but many will still want to understand and explore ideas themselves.
• In fact, AI can be a tool to enhance thinking — like a partner for brainstorming or learning.

What do you think? Do you worry AI might make us lazy thinkers, or do you see it more as a helpful assistant?

For the sake of clarity (& to avoid any accusation of plagiarism) the above post is the response provided by chat GPT when asked:

“Will ChatGPT end the art of thinking?

 

[lazyfecklessblade]

Lots of us have to wade through vague, overly wordy AI slop enough at work.

If I wanted to read 1000 word long forum posts with no insight or actual content, I’d go on Reddit.

 

[alcoblade]

Without being too harsh - surely pound for pound our worst ever signing

Very surely!

 

[ekke287]

I’d keep him on reduced terms tbh. He’s thriving in the midfield position for me so another year at this level and I think we’ll see a decent player.

 

[LBA_Blade]

Who's the zone man?

The new marvel superhero created for us!

 

[YES Blade]

Without being too harsh - surely pound for pound our worst ever signing

Our worse signing will always be John Ebbrell, no chance we’ll ever top that!

 

[71Blade]

Our worse signing will always be John Ebbrell, no chance we’ll ever top that!

Did he score on his debut went off injured never to be seen again at a cost of £1m? im sure i was at that game very promising 45 debut until the injury

 

[YES Blade]

Did he score on his debut went off injured never to be seen again at a cost of £1m? im sure i was at that game very promising 45 debut until the injury

I think he put in a cross for the goal. He definitely went off injured at half time never played again, Wikipedia says the fee was £1.2m which in 97 was a huge fee, especially for a Championship club.

 

[TJ blade]

I think he put in a cross for the goal. He definitely went off injured at half time never played again, Wikipedia says the fee was £1.2m which in 97 was a huge fee, especially for a Championship club.

What was even worse, the injury he occurred, in the match they later found out it was a reaccurance of an old injury while at Everton! Some say he failed the medical because of it , but we still signed him. Suppose we'll never know the truth.

 

[Pandev]

I think Brewster would fit with Selles. He’s an athletic striker who can play up front or move behind the striker or out onto the wing.

Selles values an athletic striker who can press, come deeper or run the flanks.

I think it all depends on how much we are willing to offer and if he would be a starter. I don’t think he will be first team.

Brewster will want wages similar to what he is currently on but I don’t think his ability matches that. More than likely he goes elsewhere seeking a first team place and wages to reflect it.

 

[Need4speed]

Not ITK in anyway but I can't believe anyone will be willing to pay Brewster more than we have offered him.

 

[Bell4]

I’d keep him on reduced terms tbh. He’s thriving in the midfield position for me so another year at this level and I think we’ll see a decent player.

Thriving ?

 

[radio]

You can't imagine a world where an AI model looks at Brewster's stats and suggests him as a target for us, so Id be amazed if he stayed.

Probably would have been an AI selection when we signed him

 

[adiosmiamigo]

Wilf.

It's always Wilf

Does it have to be Wilf? Why not me?

 

[Nick Jansky]

What was even worse, the injury he occurred, in the match they later found out it was a reaccurance of an old injury while at Everton! Some say he failed the medical because of it , but we still signed him. Suppose we'll never know the truth.

He failed the medical but Kendall insisted on the signing. This meant he wasn’t insured.

 

[TJ blade]

The lad definitely has heart ,but I think a change would do him good personally if I was him ( if he wants to stay in the area ) look at Barnsley, Rotherham or donny ,I think a drop would be advisable to reserect his career

Can't fault him for having heart, but we want somebody who can play football, and sadly he looks out of his depth at this level.

 

[jt64]

I think he put in a cross for the goal. He definitely went off injured at half time never played again, Wikipedia says the fee was £1.2m which in 97 was a huge fee, especially for a Championship club.

Give or take a hundred grand, that's what Barnsley were able to pay us for Fjortoft a few months later, albeit strikers typically cost more. Stockport were able to pay nearly a million for a forward the summer afterwards. I don't think that "huge fee" is anywhere near as huge as you remember it being. Then again, there's some that say what we paid for Brewster was also a huge fee

 

[71Blade]

Can't fault him for having heart, but we want somebody who can play football, and sadly he looks out of his depth at this level.

I think it's time to move on likeable character high wages reinvest that in some loan players. He has had long enough. thank you Rhian but the time is now in my opinion for you to cut your cloth elsewhere

 

[Addison]

What was even worse, the injury he occurred, in the match they later found out it was a reaccurance of an old injury while at Everton! Some say he failed the medical because of it , but we still signed him. Suppose we'll never know the truth.

The rumour was the scar tissue on his ankles were so bad the medical team refused to sign him off. Kendall was adamant he wanted him and insisted he be signed. Kendall was probably half cut when he made the decision and it impacted on our ability to claim insurance further down the line. Total cost to the club for 45 minutes including fee and wages was estimated to be £1.75 million which was a fortune in those days.

 

[YES Blade]

Give or take a hundred grand, that's what Barnsley were able to pay us for Fjortoft a few months later, albeit strikers typically cost more. Stockport were able to pay nearly a million for a forward the summer afterwards. I don't think that "huge fee" is anywhere near as huge as you remember it being. Then again, there's some that say what we paid for Brewster was also a huge fee

£1.2m would be something like a £12m signing these days. For a club like ours, it was a huge fee.

 

[Ranmoorblade]

£1.2m would be something like a £12m signing these days. For a club like ours, it was a huge fee.

£1.2 million in 1997 is equivalent to £2.4 million today.

 

[HOT CURRIE 10]

I’d keep him on reduced terms tbh. He’s thriving in the midfield position for me so another year at this level and I think we’ll see a decent player.

Thriving!! Could do with a good pre season behind him.

 

[Frank the tank]

£1.2 million in 1997 is equivalent to £2.4 million today.

Not in football all terms
A one million pound player then would cost ten times that now

 

[YES Blade]

£1.2 million in 1997 is equivalent to £2.4 million today.

Not in football terms, the world record fee was £15m for Shearer! The world record is now £200m!

Football inflation is a bit different!

 

[Aganarama]

What was even worse, the injury he occurred, in the match they later found out it was a reaccurance of an old injury while at Everton! Some say he failed the medical because of it , but we still signed him. Suppose we'll never know the truth.

This wasn’t the issue they had found on his medical that led to a massive argument one away day dinner. Kendall desperately wanted him. The physio team didn’t.