Fallowfields team to go loopy at Luton

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

FallowfieldBlade

The Names Blade Fallowfield Blade
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
6,365
Reaction score
7,732
Much better performance from the super blades last week I don't think i have ever seen so many attacking options at the lane

As for Mcburnie , all I'm saying is I told you so that lad is a proper no9 and will bag 20 when he gets one all you so called "fans" give your head a wobble for doubting OM9

My one gripe is the constant playing of Jimmy fleck the bloke needs dropping

My team would be

-----------League one Wes------

BASH ---ANEL--EGAN---RND---LOWE

----------NORWOOD----DOYLE--------

---------BERGE---------MCATEE-------

---------------BREWDOGGG---------


Bash comes in at right back because baldock couldn't cross the road let alone a football

Brewster starts but its 50/50 between him and OM9

Fleck is dropped because he plays like forest gump runs
 



Much better performance from the super blades last week I don't think i have ever seen so many attacking options at the lane

As for Mcburnie , all I'm saying is I told you so that lad is a proper no9 and will bag 20 when he gets one all you so called "fans" give your head a wobble for doubting OM9

My one gripe is the constant playing of Jimmy fleck the bloke needs dropping

My team would be

-----------League one Wes------

BASH ---ANEL--EGAN---RND---LOWE

----------NORWOOD----DOYLE--------

---------BERGE---------MCATEE-------

---------------BREWDOGGG---------


Bash comes in at right back because baldock couldn't cross the road let alone a football

Brewster starts but its 50/50 between him and OM9

Fleck is dropped because he plays like forest gump runs
4 changes after smashing Blackburn? Harsh. Surely N'Diaye comes in.
 
As great as Basham is, I don't think he can do a better job than Baldock.

Also think you have to start N'Diaye after his performance last week
 
Much better performance from the super blades last week I don't think i have ever seen so many attacking options at the lane

As for Mcburnie , all I'm saying is I told you so that lad is a proper no9 and will bag 20 when he gets one all you so called "fans" give your head a wobble for doubting OM9

My one gripe is the constant playing of Jimmy fleck the bloke needs dropping

My team would be

-----------League one Wes------

BASH ---ANEL--EGAN---RND---LOWE

----------NORWOOD----DOYLE--------

---------BERGE---------MCATEE-------

---------------BREWDOGGG---------


Bash comes in at right back because baldock couldn't cross the road let alone a football

Brewster starts but its 50/50 between him and OM9

Fleck is dropped because he plays like forest gump runs
Oh dear, Thankfully you're not picking the actual side
 
McAtee and Doyle will not start together in an away game this early in the campaign.
Not starting our best player up top in place of one of two strikers who don't strike is equivalent to selecting a team without a goalkeeper.
Fine with Doyle for Jimmy but Khadra instead of McAtee.
 
I know Baldock's delivery from out wide isn't brilliant, but I do think it's been a bit better so far this season and you can't seriously think Basham's is better?
 



Maybe save the I-told-you-sos for when he actually scores a few rather than missing a bunch of sitters.
Theres only one ;)



What does Forrest Gump run like then ?
Fleck played very well last week
Anyone normal would have said The team to go and larrop Luton.
 
Theres only one ;)



What does Forrest Gump run like then ?
Fleck played very well last week
Anyone normal would have said The team to go and larrop Luton.

Good point, well made!

And for the record McBurnie did play well but he didn't impress me as someone who is about to go on a scoring streak.
 
Having a look at fallows team is now well and truly part of my pre match ritual.
I have to say that this one has me head scratching… more than usual!
Drops McB when you’d think, as he’s a big advocate, that this game would suit him.
No Ndiaye (or Khadra for that matter) when he’s obviously gonna be on a high and our something special.
Bash in for Baldock? Why?
I would like to see Doyle so fair enough. But can’t imagine Fleck being dropped.
Overall this weeks offering is a 4/10 for me 😂
 
........................Foderingham
................. Anel.....Egan.....RND
.........Baldock...........................Lowe
.................Norwood.......Fleck
..........Berge..........................Ndiaye
..........................McBurnie

Defence
The back 5 picks itself until Ciaran Clark comes back.
Difficult decision when he does come back as RND & Lowe have been excellent. Still feel that we need Clark's more formidable presence though.

Midfield
I'd stick with Norwood & Fleck but give Doyle
25-30 mins. On Tuesday night, home to Reading, I'd start Doyle.
One of Norwood / Fleck will need a rest.

Attack
Berge has to play.
I think there's a lot to be said for playing players in form.
Ndiaye and McBurnie performed great on Saturday, so I'd be inclined against breaking their momentum.
 
Last edited:
Much better performance from the super blades last week I don't think i have ever seen so many attacking options at the lane

As for Mcburnie , all I'm saying is I told you so that lad is a proper no9 and will bag 20 when he gets one all you so called "fans" give your head a wobble for doubting OM9

My one gripe is the constant playing of Jimmy fleck the bloke needs dropping

My team would be

-----------League one Wes------

BASH ---ANEL--EGAN---RND---LOWE

----------NORWOOD----DOYLE--------

---------BERGE---------MCATEE-------

---------------BREWDOGGG---------


Bash comes in at right back because baldock couldn't cross the road let alone a football

Brewster starts but its 50/50 between him and OM9

Fleck is dropped because he plays like forest gump runs
Tool
 
Having a look at fallows team is now well and truly part of my pre match ritual.
I have to say that this one has me head scratching… more than usual!
Drops McB when you’d think, as he’s a big advocate, that this game would suit him.
No Ndiaye (or Khadra for that matter) when he’s obviously gonna be on a high and our something special.
Bash in for Baldock? Why?
I would like to see Doyle so fair enough. But can’t imagine Fleck being dropped.
Overall this weeks offering is a 4/10 for me 😂
He clearly puts up a daft team to get a bit of reaction and attention.
 
Dear Mr Fallowfield I gave you 9/10 last week but this week your back sniffing the Ajax I'm afraid. Illy and Baldock start all day long , So it's a no from me 4/10
 
I think there is smg in rotating McBrurnie and Brewster and seeing if one claims the shirt and try and get themselves into form, fitness and confidence. I also like the idea of bringing in Khadra or McAtee and giving Ndiaye the central role, because they could improve the crossing. For this one, I would stick with McB, as well as some confidence from.tge last game, Luton are a big physical team at front and back. Brewster for Reading, unless McB really does smg to demand the shirt.
 
Wes
Ahmedhodzic Egan RND
Baldock Norwood Fleck Lowe
Berge Khadra
Ndiaye

Let's not put too much on McPub after so long on the sidelines. Might as well take it steady with Brewster too. That front 3 above is undoubtedly our most ready and threatening

Shame we don't have a 'legs in midfield' option for this game
 
Much better performance from the super blades last week I don't think i have ever seen so many attacking options at the lane

As for Mcburnie , all I'm saying is I told you so that lad is a proper no9 and will bag 20 when he gets one all you so called "fans" give your head a wobble for doubting OM9

My one gripe is the constant playing of Jimmy fleck the bloke needs dropping

My team would be

-----------League one Wes------

BASH ---ANEL--EGAN---RND---LOWE

----------NORWOOD----DOYLE--------

---------BERGE---------MCATEE-------

---------------BREWDOGGG---------


Bash comes in at right back because baldock couldn't cross the road let alone a football

Brewster starts but its 50/50 between him and OM9

Fleck is dropped because he plays like forest gump runs


So your team selection against Sunderland sports a few changes.

MANAGER - SEAN DYCHE

--BALDOKIOS--ANEL--EGAN--CLARK---LOWE

-------BERGE-----------DOYLE------

------MACATEE--------NDIAYE----

-----------BREWSTER----------


Notably the manager and McBurnie, together with Baldock who apparently now can't cross, there seems to be an inconsistency here that hopefully doesn't manifest in our overall performances. 4.8./10

Points added for persistency ;)

McBurnie will start unless injured IMO.
 
Last edited:
So your team selection against Sunderland sports a few changes.

MANAGER - SEAN DYCHE

--BALDOKIOS--ANEL--EGAN--CLARK---LOWE

-------BERGE-----------DOYLE------

------MACATEE--------NDIAYE----

-----------BREWSTER----------


Notably the manager and McBurnie, together with Baldock who apparently now can't cross, there seems to be an inconsistency here that hopefully doesn't manifest in our overall performances. 4.8./10

Points added for persistency ;)

McBurnie will start unless injured IMO.

I like baldock but basham is better IMO

Also what about roatation

Basham doesn’t deserve to have his united career fizzle out like mcgoldricks did

I think he is just as good as baldock at right Back IMO
 



I think there is smg in rotating McBrurnie and Brewster and seeing if one claims the shirt and try and get themselves into form, fitness and confidence. I also like the idea of bringing in Khadra or McAtee and giving Ndiaye the central role, because they could improve the crossing. For this one, I would stick with McB, as well as some confidence from.tge last game, Luton are a big physical team at front and back. Brewster for Reading, unless McB really does smg to demand the shirt.

I think Brewster and mcburnie have both played well this season bar the goal they need obviously

I’d play one striker with two behind
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom