Jimmy Fleck
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2019
- Messages
- 2,457
- Reaction score
- 5,730
?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
... unless it is too late and they are too old and past it.Should have had Mitrovic yonks ago
But, y'know.
'We don't sign them forrin' types' do we?
pommpey
Should have had Mitrovic yonks ago
But, y'know.
'We don't sign them forrin' types' do we?
pommpey
Sounds about right.Old and probably past it by the time we get him
pommpey
Nah we don’t want goal scorers playing for us
Seems to do better for Serbia, think he's just scored 3 in the last 2 games.At 3 goals in 27 games for Fulham this season he'd fit in nicely amongst our blank-firing forward line
Fulham 52 goals in 127 gamesAt 3 goals in 27 games for Fulham this season he'd fit in nicely amongst our blank-firing forward line
Doesn’t that kind of beat most of our strike force.At 3 goals in 27 games for Fulham this season he'd fit in nicely amongst our blank-firing forward line
What.the.actual.fuck.does.that.mean?Should have had Mitrovic yonks ago
But, y'know.
'We don't sign them forrin' types' do we?
pommpey
Most of them goals in the Championship. Mitrovic only has 14 goals in 66 appearances in the Premier League, which is actually a lower strike rate than McGoldrick and Sharp this season.Fulham 52 goals in 127 games
Serbia 39 goals in 63 games
Still only 26 but no ones good enough for Sheffield United fans![]()
He looks average at best whenever I see him
What.the.actual.fuck.does.that.mean?
Should we have signed him when he went on loan to fulham for about 50k a week? We were doing ok for ourselves at that time, with a slightly less expensively-assembled front line.
Still, dont miss an opportunity to knock the club, whatever fucking weird reason it is this time, or whoever you're aiming this bizarre dig at.
No no no
What.the.actual.fuck.does.that.mean?
Should we have signed him when he went on loan to fulham for about 50k a week? We were doing ok for ourselves at that time, with a slightly less expensively-assembled front line.
Still, dont miss an opportunity to knock the club, whatever fucking weird reason it is this time, or whoever you're aiming this bizarre dig at.
So being 'forrin' wasn't the main reason then?We "should have had" Mitrovic when? Before he signed for Premier League Newcastle for £13m when we were in League One? Or when Fulham bought him for £20m+ when we were in the Championship? We've never been in a position to get him. We probably still aren't, considering he's supposedly on 65 grand a week.
Classic!!The actual fuck it means that somewhere around that time we were relying on the mercurial but inconsistent talents of Connor Washington (15 appearances - 0 goals), Gary Madine (16 appearances - 3 goals, Scott Hogan (8 appearances 2 goals) and Ben Woodburn (7 appearances, 0 goals) to prop up our front line.
I take it the fact that since we've been promoted our top scorers haven't reached double figures is simply some 'fucking weird reason', as stated, huh? You don't reckon a couple of seasons with someone like Mitrovic (51 goals for Fulham since 2018) might have just made a small smidge of difference, or am I just making the most of an opportunity again?
Silly me. Onwards and upwards with Mousset, McBurnie, Burke and Brewster (not even fifteen goals between all four of them in the last two seasons at a price of about sixty million)
pommpey
Classic!!
You're in a hole on this one pommps.
You think we could, and should, have gone for Mitrovic instead of playing,say, Sharp? Or instead of getting Madine on loan?
We didn't have a pot to piss in at that level. What we achieved on that budget was ridiculous, first season as well as the promotion to the prem.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?