Fleck, Norwood or Lundstram gets injured who replaces them?
It's ok, we have a midfield of Ampadu and Osborne

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Fleck, Norwood or Lundstram gets injured who replaces them?
Because as the manager of the team he wants who he wants not who the Prince wants! Rojo also wanted to return to Argentina so it’s doubtful if there was any chance of him signing anyway.According to Alan Biggs, Prince was happy to provide money for Rojo but Wilder didn't want him.
Why is this so difficult for you to understand?
A single player on £30k a week costs £1.5m a season. About he same as we’d get for actually winning the cup, I suspect.But we are so short of numbers in midfield it's ridiculous. We're also still in the cup, which earns money. I think it's a really poor move not to get at least one midfielder in
According to Alan Biggs, Prince was happy to provide money for Rojo but Wilder didn't want him.
Why is this so difficult for you to understand?
Fleck, Norwood or Lundstram gets injured who replaces them?
So just to confirm you'd have been happy to spend £2.5m of money we may not have or could use next season on a player that hasn't played for the best part of 2 years to replace a player who we already have and that is now doing pretty well???
Because as the manager of the team he wants who he wants not who the Prince wants! Rojo also wanted to return to Argentina so it’s doubtful if there was any chance of him signing anyway.
So you are basically saying that the manager of the club should not be allowed to sign the players he wants, but who the owner wants?
How has he blotted it? By all accounts we spent over the budget in the summer. A loan would have been dead money like mentioned above. Signing a permanent option that is better than what we have given our position financially, league position and that its the January transfer window would be very unlikely.Not bringing in a midfielder, at the very least, is fucking negligent. And with 51 points still to say for, you would hope he might have wanted to give us the best chance possible to go out fighting. Obviously not.
The Prince has just blotted what had been a very decent start to his sole ownership.
Based on an Alan Biggs article in which he also said the Prince MAY have been dismayed at the the rejection of some of the names he allegedly put forward.Whether Rojo was right or wrong for us I don't know, my comment was about what I think happened.
Likewise with the second point. I'm not saying it should happen, I'm saying what I think happened.
Based on an Alan Biggs article in which he also said the Prince MAY have been dismayed at the the rejection of some of the names he allegedly put forward.
How has he blotted it? By all accounts we spent over the budget in the summer. A loan would have been dead money like mentioned above. Signing a permanent option that is better than what we have given our position financially, league position and that its the January transfer window would be very unlikely.
We haven't had a midfielder on the bench for 3 games, because beyond Norwood, Lunny and Fleck we don't have any who are fit or good enough to play.
At the very least we needed another option in there, the very least.
It's my opinion, and I don't expect others to agree. But I think this sends an absolutely shit message to the fanbase, which is basically, fuck it.....
Ampadu who's made his position at LCB? And Osborn who's injured that's only good at LWB?It's ok, we have a midfield of Ampadu and Osborne![]()
Ampadu who's made his position at LCB? And Osborn who's injured that's only good at LWB?
Sums our club up thoughJoe Willock Okay Yokuslu Ainsley Maitland-Niles & Josh Maja. hardly blow your socks off signings.
Sorry just some posts are mind boggling ladTwas being sarcastic, sadly![]()
Ok here's an analogy for you to explain.
A parent gives their kid pocket money once a week. They waste a lot of it on sweets last week and return for more.
The parent then says 'You can have some more money but only if you spend it on vegetables/books etc.'
The kid says no, and then nothing happens and nothing gets bought.
Based on an Alan Biggs article in which he also said the Prince MAY have been dismayed at the the rejection of some of the names he allegedly put forward.
We did no doubt, but if the players hadn't fucked it first by playing like bellends for 15 or so out of our 21 games, I think he'd have backed him reasonably as he has done every window since he took over.
Also can't really blame him for suggesting a few of his own names with some of the players we've bought, hardly hit the ground running and really make a big impact do they, not since summer 2018 probably unless I'm having a brain fart.
I agree on a lot of that. I am sure we all saw a team that looked like shadows of themselves from the start of last year, until very recently, and I wouldn't argue that a lot of our recent signings haven't been sensational. That being said, I maintain that Mousset and McBurnie paid their way last season, because they played a huge part in keeping us up. And whilst Berge, Osborn and Bogle could have been better, they have hardly been disastrous.
But to re-iterate, what does this now say to us all with 17 games left and a threadbare squad? I still think we are generally well run, and assuming we go down, will have a good go at coming straight back up, but FFS, the club has really just acquiesced, just as the team started to look half decent again.
I agree with your slight frustration. Given the likelihood of losing at least 2 midfielders in the summer if we go down, and the current injuries, not bringing in someone seems bonkers to me.I agree on a lot of that. I am sure we all saw a team that looked like shadows of themselves from the start of last year, until very recently, and I wouldn't argue that a lot of our recent signings haven't been sensational. That being said, I maintain that Mousset and McBurnie paid their way last season, because they played a huge part in keeping us up. And whilst Berge, Osborn and Bogle could have been better, they have hardly been disastrous.
I still think that we are generally well run, and assuming we do go down, will have a good go at coming straight back up. But FFS and to re-iterate, what does this now say to us all with 17 games left and a threadbare squad? The club really has now completely acquiesced, just as the team started to look half decent again.
Fair points in the main, however I think it’s a bit disingenuous to correlate the lack of ability for average football fans on a forum to identify a laundry list of candidates, with absolute evidence that there’s nobody out there. If identification of the ‘who’ was that easy, multi-million £ recruitment teams wouldn’t be needed.I’d like to know who these magical midfielders are who:
1 - would come to us on loan within our wage structure and league position
2 - would slot into our team
3 - would improve our squad
4 - would merit a place more than one of our youth lads
5 - would be happy to sit around and wait for an injury or suspension in order to get their chance
All well and good saying we need someone if one of our MFs gets injured or suspended, but who? Who’s going to come who can meet all those criteria? Saying ‘we need a midfielder’ as though it’s as easy as clicking your fingers is naive in the extreme.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?