Houso
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 6,394
- Reaction score
- 11,463
I wouldn't disagree with much of that WB, but Neil doesn't help with his regular swipes at the club these days and his lack of understanding of how we think up here.
That said; and while I accept it's a tiny point, I would have to disagree on the subs point. Warnock was so stubborn and driven by his ego, that it would take him forever to get a sub on despite the obvious need for one. It cost us in many important matches.
I think that's close to Neil's biggest failing too. He managed to get us up over the course of the season and we had a few matches left in which we could manage to get the final points we needed. Had that been ONE match, I think we'd have never reached the Premier. His decision-making when we had a big match to win always went off at the deep end. We should have stayed up that season, and while kudos is deserved for how close we got, we had so many chances to make it safe that it was this that led to the chop.
Neil's negativity and big match nerves lost him the job I'm afraid.
That said; and while I accept it's a tiny point, I would have to disagree on the subs point. Warnock was so stubborn and driven by his ego, that it would take him forever to get a sub on despite the obvious need for one. It cost us in many important matches.
I think that's close to Neil's biggest failing too. He managed to get us up over the course of the season and we had a few matches left in which we could manage to get the final points we needed. Had that been ONE match, I think we'd have never reached the Premier. His decision-making when we had a big match to win always went off at the deep end. We should have stayed up that season, and while kudos is deserved for how close we got, we had so many chances to make it safe that it was this that led to the chop.
Neil's negativity and big match nerves lost him the job I'm afraid.