Daily Mail article on Prince Abdullah

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Sothall_Blade

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
6,787
Reaction score
8,719

Before reading the article, I feared the worst but it seems like a total non-story to me.
They’ve obviously been trying to dig up the “dirt” on PA since he won the ownership battle.
I’m quite happy if this is the worst they can come up with.
 



Even the comments section seems to have seen through it. That’s normally the home of the biggest over-reactions on the internet.....well apart from on here after a loss that is.

Comments on that article are being monitored in advance. I’m sure there were some absolute corkers from a combination of Pigs, West Ham and Tommy Robinson fans that have been blocked.
 
Other than Adolf and friends I cant think of a more white supremacist bunch of C**** than Americans. Obviously there are exceptions, but the country is built on genocide and slavery, it really grinds my gears.
Agree wholeheartedly mate. Bullying the world for decades whilst claiming to be the victim. Land of the free my arse. .......Donald Trump, the Star Spangled Spanner.😁
 
The Mail, eh?

What they wanted to put was

''

Except that might be a lickle bit controversial.

Horrid, shit-raking fuckers.

pommpey
The end of this month mate , wait till the end of this month, then it’ll be able to really get into gear
Only problem will be there won’t be enough foreigners coming over ere Robbin our jobs and taking our houses
 
Last edited by a moderator:



Even the comments section seems to have seen through it. That’s normally the home of the biggest over-reactions on the internet.....well apart from on here after a loss that is.
And the shout box mate ,you forgot the shout box you want to see righteous indignation clock on that on a match day
 
Other than Adolf and friends I cant think of a more white supremacist bunch of C**** than Americans. Obviously there are exceptions, but the country is built on genocide and slavery, it really grinds my gears.

But then after them who's next worst? I'll bring the can opener. Hope you like worms!
 
The United Arab Emirates appear to have an issue with CAIR (the group in question), labelling them a “terrorist organisation” in 2014. One of the group’s founders appears to have links with Hamas (but then again, so does Magic Grandpa Jez), and the UAE has problems with the Muslim Brotherhood (another supposed link). Still, it’s always many shades of grey where the Middle East is concerned.
 
My comment regarding the moral direction of the Daily Mail has been hidden by the way. Whilst I support the moderators right to do this, I have no fucking idea why, in context, this is deemed necessary.

I still uphold (if it is okay) that the Daily Mail are hate-filled, shit-stirring bastards who feed small minds the populist crap which blights humanity. The article is a clear example of this.

HRHs support of the cause is a non-story, as is the Bin Laden bullshit a few months ago.

pompey
 
My comment regarding the moral direction of the Daily Mail has been hidden by the way. Whilst I support the moderators right to do this, I have no fucking idea why, in context, this is deemed necessary.

I still uphold (if it is okay) that the Daily Mail are hate-filled, shit-stirring bastards who feed small minds the populist crap which blights humanity. The article is a clear example of this.

HRHs support of the cause is a non-story, as is the Bin Laden bullshit a few months ago.

pompey

They are no better than The Sun in my eyes. For the most part The Sun is just sensationalist, out of context and irrelevant journalism dumbed down for the masses with the sprinkle of absolutely abhorrent stories against anyone and everyone.

The Mail is much more calculated and re-inforces the middle/upper class white privilege every single day. They are more subtle with their misplaced nationalistic drivel but with a tendency to blame immigrants for absolutely everything. In other words the fella who's written that article will have spent weeks trying to dig up some dirt on the Prince and that will be the worst he could come up with, but he's decided to roll with it anyway. It's what these rags do, print total non-stories to satisfy people's need to be outraged.
 

Before reading the article, I feared the worst but it seems like a total non-story to me.
They’ve obviously been trying to dig up the “dirt” on PA since he won the ownership battle.
I’m quite happy if this is the worst they can come up with.

It's in the Mail so only fit to wipe yer arse with.
 
It's in the Mail so only fit to wipe yer arse with.

My now deceased 95 year old mother took the Mail every day until her death this year. She viewed it's news as gospel and her politics were as described by herself as "to the right of Atilla the Hun". Strangely she detested Princess Diana, the thin dim lass and "that half caste".

Sometimes you just have to accept that the death of another Daily Mail reader is a blessing to the rest of the world.
 
My comment regarding the moral direction of the Daily Mail has been hidden by the way. Whilst I support the moderators right to do this, I have no fucking idea why, in context, this is deemed necessary.

I still uphold (if it is okay) that the Daily Mail are hate-filled, shit-stirring bastards who feed small minds the populist crap which blights humanity. The article is a clear example of this.

HRHs support of the cause is a non-story, as is the Bin Laden bullshit a few months ago.

pompey
I'm with you Pommpey! I think your comments about the Mail are very moderate. Neo-fascist bastards!
 
My comment regarding the moral direction of the Daily Mail has been hidden by the way. Whilst I support the moderators right to do this, I have no fucking idea why, in context, this is deemed necessary.

I still uphold (if it is okay) that the Daily Mail are hate-filled, shit-stirring bastards who feed small minds the populist crap which blights humanity. The article is a clear example of this.

HRHs support of the cause is a non-story, as is the Bin Laden bullshit a few months ago.

pompey

As per the notification you received at the time I removed from public view, it wasn't the point you were making, rather the easy to misinterpret example 'quote' you posted that, whilst accurate for said publication, included racist terms easy to take out of context to those unfamiliar with the Mail or with a first language other than English.

Stick it to the Mail as much as you like.
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom