Gaini Blade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2021
- Messages
- 9,571
- Reaction score
- 14,493
Harry Arter is REFUSING to terminate his £40k-per-week Nottingham Forest contract despite not playing for two years
Good on you lad, drain em dry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Harry Arter is REFUSING to terminate his £40k-per-week Nottingham Forest contract despite not playing for two years
His original contract ran out last year, but their promotion triggered an extra year, and a payriseHarry Arter is REFUSING to terminate his £40k-per-week Nottingham Forest contract despite not playing for two years
Another example of all that wrong with modern day Premier League football.His original contract ran out last year, but their promotion triggered an extra year, and a payrise
Good offer sub-par players insane amounts of money, be prepared to get royally fucked dry when they refuse to leaveHarry Arter is REFUSING to terminate his £40k-per-week Nottingham Forest contract despite not playing for two years
Why would he? If someone paid me 2m a year to basically be a member of a fitness club and watch some Prem footy live, I’d snap their hands off!Harry Arter is REFUSING to terminate his £40k-per-week Nottingham Forest contract despite not playing for two years
Exactly they could pay him up if their that botheredWhy would he? If someone paid me 2m a year to basically be a member of a fitness club and watch some Prem footy live, I’d snap their hands off!
I still think the mass spending spree is going to catch up with them , too big a squad & wage bill ,be interesting when they have to post their accountsHeard henry winter on talksport this morning saying steve cooper had worked miracles at forest
They have the 11 th highest wage bill and a 208 million net spend which puts them 11th on net spend over the last 5 years
Even though they have only been in the prem for two
Surely anything under 11 th is an underachievement
Their owner is one the most corrupt fuckers about. On trial for drug smuggling and other crimes and multiple witnesses all mysteriously died before the court date.
The Vampire Ship
How the seizure of Europe's largest heroin shipment created bloody fallout throughout the world—and sparked still-raging political corruption scandals in Turkey, Greece, and the Middle Eastnewrepublic.com
Can VAR intervene for a 2nd yellow. Thought they could only get involved if first yellow should be a red and vice versa.Watching florist v Bournemouth and have seen the worst red card ever. Well second yellow. Boly gets sent off for a great tackle. Mixed emotions though. One hand, happened to florist so.... but on the other the laws of the game are thrown into the toilet. VAR should have intervened as an obvious error. The game is becoming, if not there, a joke cause of those running VAR.
Who knowsCan VAR intervene for a 2nd yellow. Thought they could only get involved if first yellow should be a red and vice versa.
Great result at Villa, but dropping 2 points in the 97th minute is gutting given today’s scores.A bit frustrating that Luton & Burnley won, but to be honest Forest’s late home defeat is much more significant. That is a great result & keeps the bottom 3 all in touch.
All down to us to close the gap on Boxing Day. We win & they lose at Newcastle & we are within 2 points. UTB!!! Happy Christmas Blades & let’s all stay positive with Wilder & get the Lane rocking on Boxing Day!
Can VAR intervene for a 2nd yellow. Thought they could only get involved if first yellow should be a red and vice versa.
I don’t want VAR at all but we’re stuck with it now. So given that I do think that if a yellow leads to a red then they should look albeit the problem with that comes when the first yellow is a shocking decision not the second.It's a weird one. It's obviously a very bad call but then these used to happen every week. Ref makes a rushed decision, guesses, whatever. People are going on about this being so bad though and proof the games gone because VAR doesn't intervene but then as others have said, in this instance it can't.
So then the obvious solution is to expand the remit of VAR so it can look at stuff like this but given how people feel about VAR and its many fuckups, no one wants that either. Gonna have to pick one.
It's not " people saying it" it's a fucking rule. Hence why Stockley Park can't tell him he's made an absolutely embarrassing decision. But after all he's human, it happens, you get the good and bad, var just scrutinises everything now so its all way more spoke about.Only just seen this.
VAR is obviously not fit for purpose. People saying it can't be used for yellow offences ,fair enough.
But it's supposed to be used for 'clear and obvious ' reasons.
Well quite clearly and quite obviously THE REFEREE has made a massive error.
So why haven't Stockley Park been in the refs ear telling him he's made a right Bollocks of that Decision and to overturn it?
Could it be that they don't want to admit referees make errors.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?