Maidenhead
Well-Known Member
Out in force in Belfast.
Even got a big banner saying BLUT GRUPPE
Even got a big banner saying BLUT GRUPPE
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Von Ricky getting em singingOut in force in Belfast.
Even got a big banner saying BLUT GRUPPE
I don't understand.
It means we are over the hump (internationals) and back to normalcy this coming weekend.I don't understand.
Nor me.I don't understand.
Loads of Big, I Hate International Breaks, Blades trying to pretend they don't know where the BLUT is....
Love it
Translates as " Blood Group " I believe.Out in force in Belfast.
Even got a big banner saying BLUT GRUPPE
Wrong...International football is OK in the summer when we have fuck all else to do. In the season it's a pain in the arse. This cup BS they have created is like a pre season tournament, it's awful and desperate as UEFA know qualification games are in general a waste of time. Stop ruining weekends UEFA with this crap.
Wrong...
Because... Football....Why?
Because... Football....
Translates as " Blood Group " I believe.
derekacorah thanks for that insight. I'm a committed England fan & I do view things rather simply. Have a tournament, trophy & medals & the right to call yourselves "the winners". Have some jeopardy & consequence - relegation. And you've got a basis for better games of football. The Nations League format is far from perfect. Groups of three, playing just four games each, does not give a true meritocracy that larger groups would (for eg). But, it's a step in the right direction. And a vast improvement on "friendly internationals". And, remember, there's no increase in the number of games. The Nations League REPLACES friendlies. And, doesn't interfere too much with the existing EURO & World Cup arrangements.Watching the 2nd half of the England match actually made me change my mind about this tournament, what before would have been played out to a meaningless draw was actually contested by both teams and made for a bit more of a spectacle. Can’t be a bad thing that the games have something riding on them, even it’s a rather contrived “something”.
derekacorah thanks for that insight. I'm a committed England fan & I do view things rather simply. Have a tournament, trophy & medals & the right to call yourselves "the winners". Have some jeopardy & consequence - relegation. And you've got a basis for better games of football. The Nations League format is far from perfect. Groups of three, playing just four games each, does not give a true meritocracy that larger groups would (for eg). But, it's a step in the right direction. And a vast improvement on "friendly internationals". And, remember, there's no increase in the number of games. The Nations League REPLACES friendlies. And, doesn't interfere too much with the existing EURO & World Cup arrangements.
However, I am intrigued by what you mean when you say it's a contrived something. I'm genuinely interested in why you think it's contrived.
derekacorah Thanks. I'd assume that lots of people would be naturally sceptical about any new tournament that UEFA have dreamt up. "All about the money" etc. So, I do understand comments about "contrived" etc. But, at root it remains a simple like v like, win your games, win your medals competition. Despite UEFA, I'm a big fan.Thanks Phil, I think rather than “contrived” I mean that the meaning of the competition (being brand new) is actually not that much at all and has been dreamed up to try and make these games have some meaning.
As I said, I’m now fully bought into it and agree that it’s much better than the playing of additional meaningless friendlies.
That said, if I were a Scotland fan I’m not sure I’d be that bothered. At least England are playing for something a bit more meaningful than not having to play Albania again.
Doesn’t it also provide a ‘back door’ Euro qualification for the winners of the lower groups? So Scotland have something to play for.Thanks Phil, I think rather than “contrived” I mean that the meaning of the competition (being brand new) is actually not that much at all and has been dreamed up to try and make these games have some meaning.
As I said, I’m now fully bought into it and agree that it’s much better than the playing of additional meaningless friendlies.
That said, if I were a Scotland fan I’m not sure I’d be that bothered. At least England are playing for something a bit more meaningful than not having to play Albania again.
Same here. I enjoyed the commitment shown by both teams.Watching the 2nd half of the England match actually made me change my mind about this tournament, what before would have been played out to a meaningless draw was actually contested by both teams and made for a bit more of a spectacle. Can’t be a bad thing that the games have something riding on them, even it’s a rather contrived “something”.
HighfieldBlade We're on the same page aren't we? Nations League winners in June 2019 are just that, Nations League Winners. It gives you bragging rights & better seeding for the normal 2020 ten groups of 5 or 6 teams, play each other home & away March, June, September, October, November 2019, top two qualify groups, to give 20 EURO 2020 qualified teams.Same here. I enjoyed the commitment shown by both teams.
I've been reading up about this tournament, but one thing is still not clear to me...If England "win" the Nations League Tournament in June (I think), will it also gain them automatic entry to the 2020 [?] Euros? Edit: Just seen the reply above from Ball_Sup (Phil) . Thanks
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?