LudlamBlade
UTB
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2020
- Messages
- 1,789
- Reaction score
- 3,593
Well it is, to a point.Not how it works
All financial markets are based on the comparative values of other assets within the same market.
Obviously football is a market unlike many others but, in my opinion, the fundamental principles of a capitalist market still hold true.
You only have to look at the knock-on effect caused by deals like Rio Ferdinand, Pogba, Walker, Maguire etc...all huge money fees and changed the market.
Do you really think Kepa would have cost £70m+ if it hadn't been for Liverpool paying £60m+ for Alisson?
Or that Southampton would have got so much for Van Dijk if it hadn't been for Man U paying silly money for Maguire?
There are always exceptions to the rule. However I feel that when buying sought-after players, just as when buying any sought-after asset, you have to pay the market rate.
I just struggle to see how people can think Ramsdale is worth more than two of the best keepers in the league, or even (as an alternative example) Ollie Watkins.
Both English, both young, both involved on the fringes of the England set up...however one is a consistent goalscorer at every level he's played at and the other is a keeper who's seen two relegations in consecutive seasons, and had a couple of good spells during those seasons - as well as a couple of absolutely terrible ones.
I still say £20m+ and we'd be mad to say no. We've got a ready made replacement in Verrips, he's plenty good enough for the Championship!