mattbianco1
Forum Royalty
That's the loose translation for the Neanderthal supporters they're on about.
https://www.sufc.co.uk/news/2017/september/statement/
https://www.sufc.co.uk/news/2017/september/statement/
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Violence in any form is unacceptable at Bramall Lane
Well, apart from the boxing.
Violence in any form is unacceptable at Bramall Lane
And between Billy and Leon.
"and a 39-year-old have both been charged by police since the weekend and their Kop season tickets have already been annulled."
Which just goes to show that you're never too old to be a dickhead.
I would like to express my condemnation for the bottle-throwers on Saturday. Both of them missed by a mile. Such a shoddy level of accuracy has no place at Sheffield United.
Goes to show that the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" doesn't apply to football. The punishment is dished out before any conviction.
Been charged, not found guilty at this stage. Reasonable to suspend season ticket until legal case is over. Return it if found not guilty. I don't see anything wrong with that.Goes to show that the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" doesn't apply to football. The punishment is dished out before any conviction.
Perhaps they missed on purpose as an ironic gesture with regard to our shooting ability in the game......... then again that would be assuming a level of intelligence that is clearly beyond the perpetrators.
I imagine that's because the CCTV evidence is damming against them.Goes to show that the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" doesn't apply to football. The punishment is dished out before any conviction.
I certainly think that the punishment should be more lenient if you can prove that the crime was ironic or satirical.
Like throwing a bottle of piss into the away end on 44 minutes as a tribute to Samir Carruthers or something.
Class it as a 'suspension' until investigation completeGoes to show that the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" doesn't apply to football. The punishment is dished out before any conviction.
Surprised syp have not sold the footage to channel 4 yet ,not like them to get anything wrong .#dispatchesI imagine that's because the CCTV evidence is damming against them.
Plus the club don't need legal condition of guilt to ban people from their private grounds. You can be banned from a nightclub or restaurant just for being rude to the staff. Club needs to aggressively stamp out these moronsBeen charged, not found guilty at this stage. Reasonable to suspend season ticket until legal case is over. Return it if found not guilty. I don't see anything wrong with that.
Banning orders don't work...at all. Only for England away games as you have your passport taken from you. When you get a ban, you should have to report to the police station 30 mins before the game, thats the only way you can keep them away.
That's not really practical though. I doubt SYPD would be interested. Maybe the alternative would be an automatic custodial sentence for breaching a banning order. Then, if you were on one and breaching it, you'd keep your head down.Banning orders don't work...at all. Only for England away games as you have your passport taken from you. When you get a ban, you should have to report to the police station 30 mins before the game, thats the only way you can keep them away.
That's not really practical though. I doubt SYPD would be interested. Maybe the alternative would be an automatic custodial sentence for breaching a banning order. Then, if you were on one and breaching it, you'd keep your head down.
So banning orders do work.They already do that. And banning orders have massively curtailed trouble at the football.
Nope, when i was banned, i attended many games including Burnley play off final. Too easy.So banning orders do work.
Did you cause any trouble?Nope, when i was banned, i attended many games including Burnley play off final. Too easy.
The club are partly to blame, they've been too soft on knob heads for too long. Seems that the action is only taken when something lands on the pitch and an away supporter gets his jaw broken.That's the loose translation for the Neanderthal supporters they're on about.
https://www.sufc.co.uk/news/2017/september/statement/
No, but then i never caused any to get banned.I wasnt even going to the game, I had a fight with a dickhead near the ground and had a ban imposed on me. Got a kicking from syp on BP forecourt, went to bring charges against a certain officer, but the cctv had dissapeared ! Got ban overturned a year later. Never had an issue with attending on a banning order, get tickets from a mate, its that easy !Did you cause any trouble?
Ban him.Class it as a 'suspension' until investigation complete
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?