BladeTillIDie
Active Member
- Banned
- #1
I know he's not cheap and mixed views on him in PL but he's a big lad who can score. Different type to what we have currently..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Of course we should sign him. Only issues:
£40m
£100k a week
Already in his national team
London
Club dont need to sell
Player wouldn't sign for us, he'll (rightly) be aiming much higher
Pie in the Sky. Which is unfortunate because he'd be perfect
Yes but he deflates in the cold.is there a Mys Soufflet out there.
Of course we should sign him. Only issues:
£40m
£100k a week
Already in his national team
London
Club dont need to sell
Player wouldn't sign for us, he'll (rightly) be aiming much higher
Pie in the Sky. Which is unfortunate because he'd be perfect
Sure I remember reading Winkel flagged him up before he was worth a fortune. The prince was Keen to sign players early. Don't know how much of a personal relationship they had/have if at all.The one thing we have going for us in this case (besides being in the Premier League!) is that he seems like the sort of big name the Prince might be interested in signing.
But as YES Blade said, I don't think we'll be shopping for strikers in January.
Villa going in for him according to Sky. Are we in a postion financially to compete?
Villa going in for him according to Sky. Are we in a postion financially to compete?
Could just imagine Smifff going to the board and asking for £millions to top off his spending spree and complete a world class squad. He’d go down quicker than GrealishVilla going in for him according to Sky. Are we in a postion financially to compete?
Their plan is to keep digging down as ultimately you have to come out the other side at some point.After getting into a nine figure transfer hole, is this their attempt to start digging upwards?
It's okay saying Villa going for him and can we compete, Villa are so close to breaking PL FFP rules I can't see how unless they sell St Andrews (Birmingham City would be angry).Villa going in for him according to Sky. Are we in a postion financially to compete?
He just needs to learn how to run, he always looks so slow to me, like one of those power walkers that walk funny, wagging their arse about.We've got McBurnie for the big man role and there's I very much doubt we'll be going for Mitrovic. McBurnie is improving all the time too.
Values have gone down with everyone since your post.Of course we should sign him. Only issues:
£40m
£100k a week
Already in his national team
London
Club dont need to sell
Player wouldn't sign for us, he'll (rightly) be aiming much higher
Pie in the Sky. Which is unfortunate because he'd be perfect
Big, fat, lazy, immobile twat on £60,000 a week? No thanks.
What utter bollocks
If he is big fat and lazy and immobile and gets 26 league goals and top scorer in the championship what does that make the rest of the strikers in the league he also averages a goal every 135 minutes
Don't know what the obsession is with our fans worrying about wages all the time we are in the Premier league not the championship 60k a week is peanuts in this league and Mitrovic would be worth every penny with the right service he would get the goals for us too.
Because if you pay one guy 65k a week, the next guy wants it too, then so does the next guy & the guy after that...
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?