Dear Mr Mc Cabe

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Tony

Tony

"Eacha heart out ya bums"
Joined
May 30, 2013
Messages
1,392
Reaction score
1,737
Seems Tuna man is going to do a Q & A for the pigs, maybe you can do the same and let us know where all the dosh is going and what the future holds.
As for CW, seems to be unconcerned that he's getting only money for loan players. His attitude leaves me to think he's gonna pull a rabbit out of the hat. Or maybe a surprise signing.
Still think it's maybe best to get a loan, see what happens and then try for a full deal if it works. Bet the pigs would have preferred Nogoals on a loan deal rather than screwing up £10.4 million on a transfer fee and getting on £10 million plus in signing on fee, wages over the next three years.
Just wondered if we'd signed Woodburn for say £6 million with the Brook's money. Don't think we would have been too happy.
West Brom have done well, spent loadsa money, but on tried and tested players.
 

I haven't got a problem with loans next month, January is a stupidly inflated market to work in so it makes sense to spend any money we have on wages alone. Can we get the quality that need though? As the OP says it looks like Wilder is fairly confident so we shall see. After all he didn't too bad in the summer with a limited budget, Hendo, Egan, Norwood and McG have all improved us from last season.

In terms of McCabe fronting up for a Q&A I would expect him to keep is head down whilst all this legal BS is ongoing, don't blame him either.
 
Tony said:
Seems Tuna man is going to do a Q & A for the pigs, maybe you can do the same and let us know where all the dosh is going and what the future holds.
Click to expand...

Court in May is about the long and short of it.

January budget 'agreed'.
 
Tony said:
Seems Tuna man is going to do a Q & A for the pigs, maybe you can do the same and let us know where all the dosh is going and what the future holds.
As for CW, seems to be unconcerned that he's getting only money for loan players. His attitude leaves me to think he's gonna pull a rabbit out of the hat. Or maybe a surprise signing.
Still think it's maybe best to get a loan, see what happens and then try for a full deal if it works. Bet the pigs would have preferred Nogoals on a loan deal rather than screwing up £10.4 million on a transfer fee and getting on £10 million plus in signing on fee, wages over the next three years.
Just wondered if we'd signed Woodburn for say £6 million with the Brook's money. Don't think we would have been too happy.
West Brom have done well, spent loadsa money, but on tried and tested players.
Click to expand...

They haven't. They've bought in the keeper for less than they got for selling McClean and Evans. Gayle, Barnes and Adarabioyo are on loan, the latter being the Man City youth on £25k a week who bought the £2.5m house.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
Whaaaat????? £60 million in 2 seasons and nearly £12 million this. Little bit more than us.
 
No calls for the Prince then?
Wasn’t he the one attempting to force out McCabe initially and then not wanting to match the proposed investment in case somehow Kev won?

Also, West Brom have huge parachute payments.
What’s their wage bill on top of transfer outlay?
You can’t expect parity from us, unless you’re being totally unrealistic.
 
Flatulent_Bob said:
No calls for the Prince then?
Wasn’t he the one attempting to force out McCabe initially and then not wanting to match the proposed investment in case somehow Kev won?

Also, West Brom have huge parachute payments.
What’s their wage bill on top of transfer outlay?
You can’t expect parity from us, unless you’re being totally unrealistic.
Click to expand...
Totally unrealistic?
US ??????????????? :D
 
Flatulent_Bob said:
No calls for the Prince then?
Wasn’t he the one attempting to force out McCabe initially and then not wanting to match the proposed investment in case somehow Kev won?
Click to expand...
You have got that upside down ....

Yes McCabe wanted to invest more money as a loan ....... the Prince refused

The Prince wanted to give money to the Club to invest, it was McCabe that baulked at this ........

Which gives you some idea about who is confident of their position

This is where Fanners (the judge) bollocked them both for being gits,

and came up with using the Brookes money for running costs (£7 million), which is what McCabe would have done anyway going on the last 20 years

Neither of the fuckers objected to this .............
 
Worksop II said:
You have got that upside down ....

Yes McCabe wanted to invest more money as a loan ....... the Prince refused

The Prince wanted to give money to the Club to invest, it was McCabe that baulked at this ........

Which gives you some idea about who is confident of their position

This is where Fanners (the judge) bollocked them both for being gits,

and came up with using the Brookes money for running costs (£7 million), which is what McCabe would have done anyway going on the last 20 years

Neither of the fuckers objected to this .............
Click to expand...
Ok so McCabe wanted to put something in for investment and the Prince would only agree if McCabe lost it if he lost the court case, which is highly likely.
So I got it a bit arse about tit, but it’s still the Prince who looked to stop the route to additional investment.
I think those attacking McCabe may look back rather more fondly when the Prince has sole control.
 
Flatulent_Bob said:
So I got it a bit arse about tit, but it’s still the Prince who looked to stop the route to additional investment.
Click to expand...
No

McCabe wanted to loan the money to the Club

The Prince wanted to gift the money to the Club

They both had a preferred method, neither would agree to the others plan
 
Worksop II said:
No

McCabe wanted to loan the money to the Club

The Prince wanted to gift the money to the Club

They both had a preferred method, neither would agree to the others plan
Click to expand...


McCabes preference was because the ball was in the Prince’s court as the option to buy rested with him. The share price was £5m. I thought it was investment in shares the Prince wanted not a gift. Therefore any additional share investment by McCabe would be worthless.

HRH, it would appear, didn’t want to pay for the property assets. I would have thought that alone would ring warning bells for even the most devout anti McCabists, without even considering he may have tried to pull a fast one.
 

Stretch said:
In terms of McCabe fronting up for a Q&A I would expect him to keep is head down whilst all this legal BS is ongoing, don't blame him either.
Click to expand...

It's the Prince who has been keeping his head down Stretch and McCabe who has been engaging in th PR stuff to get the fans onside.
 
Sean Thornton said:
Therefore any additional share investment by McCabe would be worthless.
Click to expand...
Yes, I think the upshot was, Kev wasn't gonna see any of his money back ....... though the Club would benefit from the Investment :)

Makes sense from everyones perspective .... except one guy :rolleyes:
 
Sean Thornton said:
McCabes preference was because the ball was in the Prince’s court as the option to buy rested with him. The share price was £5m. I thought it was investment in shares the Prince wanted not a gift. Therefore any additional share investment by McCabe would be worthless.

HRH, it would appear, didn’t want to pay for the property assets. I would have thought that alone would ring warning bells for even the most devout anti McCabists, without even considering he may have tried to pull a fast one.
Click to expand...

Maybe its that property asset in the corner of John Street and Bramall Lane he wasn't fussed about, you know, that loss making half empty office block that sticks out like a carbuncle between two grandstands. Maybe he didn't appreciate the "uniqueness" of it.
 
snootyfenooty said:
Maybe its that property asset in the corner of John Street and Bramall Lane he wasn't fussed about, you know, that loss making half empty office block that sticks out like a carbuncle between two grandstands. Maybe he didn't appreciate the "uniqueness" of it.
Click to expand...


How do you know it’s loss making? Loving a set of accounts I’d be interested in seeing the figures.

Just not in crayon on a fag packet though :)
 
Sean Thornton said:
How do you know it’s loss making? Loving a set of accounts I’d be interested in seeing the figures.

Just not in crayon on a fag packet though :)
Click to expand...

Because its half fucking empty. Sometimes your eyes are a better tool for assessing stuff like this than an accountancy degree. Before you go off on a tangent try addressing the rest of my post as to why this "property asset" is not an attractive proposition, i.e. why the fuck would anyone want to buy an office block inside a football ground.
 
snootyfenooty said:
Because its half fucking empty. Sometimes your eyes are a better tool for assessing stuff like this than an accountancy degree. Before you go off on a tangent try addressing the rest of my post as to why this "property asset" is not an attractive proposition, i.e. why the fuck would anyone want to buy an office block inside a football ground.
Click to expand...
I always wondered why the Police Control was moved into there ........

Probably a way of getting some money out of the Club into the sons building .... who knows .... :rolleyes:
 
Tony said:
Seems Tuna man is going to do a Q & A for the pigs, maybe you can do the same and let us know where all the dosh is going and what the future holds.
As for CW, seems to be unconcerned that he's getting only money for loan players. His attitude leaves me to think he's gonna pull a rabbit out of the hat. Or maybe a surprise signing.
Still think it's maybe best to get a loan, see what happens and then try for a full deal if it works. Bet the pigs would have preferred Nogoals on a loan deal rather than screwing up £10.4 million on a transfer fee and getting on £10 million plus in signing on fee, wages over the next three years.
Just wondered if we'd signed Woodburn for say £6 million with the Brook's money. Don't think we would have been too happy.
West Brom have done well, spent loadsa money, but on tried and tested players.
Click to expand...
Loans are best in Jan
 
snootyfenooty said:
Because its half fucking empty. Sometimes your eyes are a better tool for assessing stuff like this than an accountancy degree. Before you go off on a tangent try addressing the rest of my post as to why this "property asset" is not an attractive proposition, i.e. why the fuck would anyone want to buy an office block inside a football ground.
Click to expand...


Well seeing as the centre isn’t run by United but by a company linked to Regus office services - which incidentally made a profit in 2017 - maybe your eyes are painted on? So yet again you’re spouting unsubstantiated bollocks. Just because it suits your agenda, doesn’t make it true, as we see once again.

It may actually turn a profit, who knows? But you have no idea whether it makes a loss or not because you know fuck all about it. No one needs an accountancy degree to see that. Anyone with a membership of the Teletubbies Junior Fan Club could work that out.

What next, “those statues in the car park don’t make us any money” ?
 
Worksop II said:
I always wondered why the Police Control was moved into there ........

Probably a way of getting some money out of the Club into the sons building .... who knows .... :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I can name someone who doesn’t :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dkc

snootyfenooty said:
It's the Prince who has been keeping his head down Stretch and McCabe who has been engaging in th PR stuff to get the fans onside.
Click to expand...

Fair dos Snooty. I was just thinking about the OPs suggestion now that the legal proceedings seem quite advanced. KM might not be too inclined to talk about the future too much, in case it prejudices anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom