Ricky
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2015
- Messages
- 18,219
- Reaction score
- 35,780
- Banned
- #1
Obviously a centre half is the priority but we shouldn't be neglecting the full back area. We could really do with bringing one in, ideally a left back who's good going forward and OK defensively. Probably a loan.
Our pitch is narrow and despite seemingly completing our recruitment in wide areas with Lavery, we have no conventional, chalk on the boots type of winger who will always offer width, and Wilder seems to want to play with them quite narrow anyway. There are going to be games where we struggle to break teams down - a lot of games going on what we've seen so far, because we won't always be good enough to penetrate through the middle, we're not too strong at set pieces and I doubt we have the personnel to regularly create opportunities through an effective pressing game.
It's alright saying 'the full backs will give us width' but if they're not good players, they're not going to help your attacking game too much. Maybe Hussey can be effective going forward but it comes at the cost of having a defensive liability at LB on the evidence so far. Whilst I'm more comfortable with Freeman defensively, he's not the best in that department either, and if we're going to be defensively vulnerable in the full back positions I'd want at least one who offers a lot going forward - and I'm thinking about width and pace more than good deliveries.
A full back shouldn't just be seen as a bonus signing. Nor should a midfielder by the way - a couple of decent performances from Coutts doesn't change that, it was never his type we needed to sign anyway.
Who'd be happy going until January with Freeman and Hussey at full back? Not me.
Our pitch is narrow and despite seemingly completing our recruitment in wide areas with Lavery, we have no conventional, chalk on the boots type of winger who will always offer width, and Wilder seems to want to play with them quite narrow anyway. There are going to be games where we struggle to break teams down - a lot of games going on what we've seen so far, because we won't always be good enough to penetrate through the middle, we're not too strong at set pieces and I doubt we have the personnel to regularly create opportunities through an effective pressing game.
It's alright saying 'the full backs will give us width' but if they're not good players, they're not going to help your attacking game too much. Maybe Hussey can be effective going forward but it comes at the cost of having a defensive liability at LB on the evidence so far. Whilst I'm more comfortable with Freeman defensively, he's not the best in that department either, and if we're going to be defensively vulnerable in the full back positions I'd want at least one who offers a lot going forward - and I'm thinking about width and pace more than good deliveries.
A full back shouldn't just be seen as a bonus signing. Nor should a midfielder by the way - a couple of decent performances from Coutts doesn't change that, it was never his type we needed to sign anyway.
Who'd be happy going until January with Freeman and Hussey at full back? Not me.
Last edited: