Quick West Ham report

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Balham Blade

S24SU Seer
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
9,014
Reaction score
14,460
Location
Teddington
Met up with BladeInThatcham moDtheGod and Ollessendro for a quick pint in Aldgate before heading deeper into East London on the district line, via one comedy moment when, after the tube doors shut, BladeInThatcham thought it would be a good idea to poke fun at those who'd just missed the train...only for the doors to reopen, letting the targets of his distinctive brand of humour get on.

I have to start by saying what a fucking shambles West Ham made of the ticketing. No segregated away collections meant that we had to queue for 30 minutes with the home fans at their ticket cabin, listening to the game kick off and watching coaches full of Unitedites arriving late. Honestly, Maidstone United would have been embarrassed by that lack of organisation.

We got into the ground 25 minutes into the game so missed the first chance, which the big screen replay at halftime would suggest was a long range effort spilled then regathered by Howard. Initial impressions were that West Ham were by far the better side with United's attacking forays limited to winning the occasional corner.

Howard saved well from Valencia after he was put clean through by a slide-rule pass before a Collins foul 25 yards out gave Morrison the chance to have a strike on goal, which he took. His effort was on target but lacked the necessary power to beat Howard, who made a decent save down to his left. From the resulting corner a West Ham player got a yard on his marker, volleying in an effort that Howard had to push round the same post. Morrison took that corner short, received the return ball before diving in an attempt to win a penalty - he was rightly booked and gave the Unitedites a decent reason to sing "same old West Ham, always cheating".

The hosts didn't have to wait long to open the scoring and it was a terrible goal to concede. We're making a habit of conceding soft goals this season and this one was no different: a nothing ball lofted from the half way line found Sakho free of his marker (positionally, I think it should have been Collins) inside the penalty area and with Howard making the wrong call to come off his line, the striker's header looped in.

That was pretty much the last action of the first half but the second half started with United looking much brighter. McNulty was crowded out as, like at Peterborough, he refused a chance to shoot first time with his left foot but United didn't have to wait long to draw level. McNulty chased a lost cause down the West Ham right and won a throw in which was worked back for a cross that Reid somehow contrived to knee past a wrong-footed Jääskeläinen, with the ball trickling over the line in front of the delirious Blades.

United were now in the ascendency, with Davies and Alcock particularly prominent down the right. A series of Davies crosses caused issues for the Hammers defence without really threatening, the best effort being a Basham header way over the top. That was the cue for Allardyce to bring on bigger names, starting with £10m winger Stuart Downing, whose direct running started to cause problems for Harris. There were a lot of efforts from West Ham over the next 10 minutes but none were particularly clear cut, with United able to either crowd out the attackers or get blocks in.

Harris was replaced by McEverley after appearing to land awkwardly and Alcock put a header over the bar from a corner before Downing's deflected shot drew a world-class save from Howard, the United keeper clawing the ball out of the top corner. Zarate came on for the awful Vaz Té and Campbell-Ryce replaced Flynn for United but the pattern remained the same - West Ham in possession, United defending resolutely. The added pace of Campbell-Ryce meant that United had an outlet but the balls to him were often poor, with McNulty particularly culpable.

Doyle picked up a yellow card for bringing down a West Ham man on the break but that was the final action of the 90 minutes, with the game heading to extra time. Nothing much really happened in the additional 30 minutes with Campbell-Ryce seeing a series of shots blocked and Alcock seeing a shot blocked close in, the highlight was probably seeing Wallace make his debut, marking the occasion with some crisp passing and some wild tackling, one of which gave Valencia a chance from a free kick but his fierce effort was straight down Howard's throat.

And so to penalties. We were cheered by the choice to take the penalties in front of the United fans, with West Ham kicking first.

Noble 1-0: decent penalty low to Howard's left, atoning for his dreadful miss against Spurs
Davies 1-1: excellent penalty into the top right corner
Downing 2-1: decent shot low to Howard's right but the keeper might feel he could have stopped it, given that he got a hand to it
Collins 2-2: followed Davies in putting his penalty in the top corner
Zarate 3-2: cracking penalty. Powerful shot into the roof of the net, absolutely no chance for Howard
McNulty 3-3: Jääskeläinen got fingers to the shot but couldn't stop it down to his left
Poyet 4-3: sent Howard the wrong way and rolled it in
McEverley 4-4: into the side netting inside the left post, no chance for Jääskeläinen
Valencia 4-4: poor, poor penalty, straight down the middle and as easy a stop as Howard could have hoped for
Doyle 4-5: converted with ease into the bottom left, sparking wild celebrations from the Unitedites.

Overall thoughts
West Ham's players were better than ours. Bigger, stronger, quicker, better first touch...but they didn't play as a team and didn't have a clue how to break us down. Other than Valencia's miss in the first half I'm struggling to think of a clear cut opportunity that they created.

Once again, though, we conceded a soft, soft goal. It was a nothing ball that Collins (I think) should have dealt with but Sakho got a yard and was able to flick over a stranded Howard. After defending relatively well that could have been a hammer blow.

We equalised fortuitously but then held out and rightly asked West Ham to break us down. Even throwing on their better players didn't help with Downing and Zarate looking lively but only forcing one decent save out of Howard.

We desperately need a mobile centre forward. I like McNulty's attitude but I feel he's like a League One Billy Sharp - no outstanding attribute at this level to play in this team. Maybe if we start putting the ball at his feet 10 yards out he'll start scoring but we're not getting to the byline to get those cut-backs working.

Defensively I thought Doyle and Basham had good games, getting in West Ham's faces and denying them space. West Ham lacked experience in the centre of the park and we were able to exploit that - the fact that Morrison starting picking the ball up next to his centre halves tells you what a good job Doyle and Basham were doing. Alcock was outstanding, linking up well with Davies and keeping a very good opponent in Diamé quiet.

Ratings:
Howard 8.5
: this might seem harsh but there were two spilled shots which, on another night, could have cost us. The saves from Valencia in the first half and Downing in the second half were outstanding, however; and the penalty save was the icing on the MOTM cake.
Alcock 8: solid defensively and still had the energy to make 70 yard dashes in the second half of extra time. BladeInThatcham made the point that we've been lucky with our right backs in recent years...then we remembered McMahon.
McGahey 8: grew into the game. Solid as West Ham didn't exploit his weakness, judging high balls. I'm firmly on the side that believes that he's going to be a very good centre half.
Collins 7: see McGahey with a lost mark for losing Sakho.
Harris 7: did well; didn't get forward as much as Alcock but this wasn't a game for both full backs to be bombing on
Davies 7: not the quickest so not keen to take on the inexperienced Potts at full back but used the ball well
Basham 7: weird one. He's been tasked with being the more advanced central midfielder but I'm not sure he's got the technique to do that role. Defensively and positionally excellent, however.
Doyle 7.5: this is the sort of game that Doyle thrives in. Letting West Ham have the ball and staying solid meant that his weakness (mobility) was negated and his strength (getting stuck in) could be utilised. Not a player for an open game.
Flynn 6: didn't really get into the game at all; outmuscled by Demel pretty much whenever he got the ball
Baxter 6: not really sure where Baxter was supposed to be playing but he ended up trying to be a deep lying playmaker, with the lack of movement in front of him meaning that wasn't really an option. He also needs to get on the ball more as if he goes without it for a couple of minutes, he normally loses it when he does get it.
McNulty 5: see above. I want it to work out for McNulty but he's not got the strength, pace or movement to cause issues at this level on the evidence so far.

Subs:
McEverley (for Harris) 7: up against Downing who's better than his reputation would have you believe. Will prove to be a very good signing for us despite the initial doubts.
Campbell-Ryce (for Flynn) 7: full of running and caused more problems in 40 minutes than Flynn did in 80
Wallace (for Baxter) n/a: on for 20 minutes in extra time

Clough 8: got the tactics spot on. We looked like a team, they didn't

West Ham 5: looked like a collection of individuals without a clue how to break us down. I'd be surprised if Allardyce sees out the season.

Fans 8: fewer fans at West Ham than at Peterborough the week before tells you where our priorities are; that said, the 900 seemed to outsing the 28,000 home fans.
 

Can everyone stop adding a bloody "R" to McEveley's name please? It's becoming the new Billy Sharpe or Michael Tongue.
 
Can everyone stop adding a bloody "R" to McEveley's name please? It's becoming the new Billy Sharpe or Michael Tongue.

Every time I do that from this point forwards it'll be solely to wind you up. You missed Harry McGuire from your list, by the way.
 
Met up with BladeInThatcham moDtheGod and Ollessendro for a quick pint in Aldgate before heading deeper into East London on the district line, via one comedy moment when, after the tube doors shut, BladeInThatcham thought it would be a good idea to poke fun at those who'd just missed the train...only for the doors to reopen, letting the targets of his distinctive brand of humour get on.

I have to start by saying what a fucking shambles West Ham made of the ticketing. No segregated away collections meant that we had to queue for 30 minutes with the home fans at their ticket cabin, listening to the game kick off and watching coaches full of Unitedites arriving late. Honestly, Maidstone United would have been embarrassed by that lack of organisation.

We got into the ground 25 minutes into the game so missed the first chance, which the big screen replay at halftime would suggest was a long range effort spilled then regathered by Howard. Initial impressions were that West Ham were by far the better side with United's attacking forays limited to winning the occasional corner.

Howard saved well from Valencia after he was put clean through by a slide-rule pass before a Collins foul 25 yards out gave Morrison the chance to have a strike on goal, which he took. His effort was on target but lacked the necessary power to beat Howard, who made a decent save down to his left. From the resulting corner a West Ham player got a yard on his marker, volleying in an effort that Howard had to push round the same post. Morrison took that corner short, received the return ball before diving in an attempt to win a penalty - he was rightly booked and gave the Unitedites a decent reason to sing "same old West Ham, always cheating".

The hosts didn't have to wait long to open the scoring and it was a terrible goal to concede. We're making a habit of conceding soft goals this season and this one was no different: a nothing ball lofted from the half way line found Sakho free of his marker (positionally, I think it should have been Collins) inside the penalty area and with Howard making the wrong call to come off his line, the striker's header looped in.

That was pretty much the last action of the first half but the second half started with United looking much brighter. McNulty was crowded out as, like at Peterborough, he refused a chance to shoot first time with his left foot but United didn't have to wait long to draw level. McNulty chased a lost cause down the West Ham right and won a throw in which was worked back for a cross that Reid somehow contrived to knee past a wrong-footed Jääskeläinen, with the ball trickling over the line in front of the delirious Blades.

United were now in the ascendency, with Davies and Alcock particularly prominent down the right. A series of Davies crosses caused issues for the Hammers defence without really threatening, the best effort being a Basham header way over the top. That was the cue for Allardyce to bring on bigger names, starting with £10m winger Stuart Downing, whose direct running started to cause problems for Harris. There were a lot of efforts from West Ham over the next 10 minutes but none were particularly clear cut, with United able to either crowd out the attackers or get blocks in.

Harris was replaced by McEverley after appearing to land awkwardly and Alcock put a header over the bar from a corner before Downing's deflected shot drew a world-class save from Howard, the United keeper clawing the ball out of the top corner. Zarate came on for the awful Vaz Té and Campbell-Ryce replaced Flynn for United but the pattern remained the same - West Ham in possession, United defending resolutely. The added pace of Campbell-Ryce meant that United had an outlet but the balls to him were often poor, with McNulty particularly culpable.

Doyle picked up a yellow card for bringing down a West Ham man on the break but that was the final action of the 90 minutes, with the game heading to extra time. Nothing much really happened in the additional 30 minutes with Campbell-Ryce seeing a series of shots blocked and Alcock seeing a shot blocked close in, the highlight was probably seeing Wallace make his debut, marking the occasion with some crisp passing and some wild tackling, one of which gave Valencia a chance from a free kick but his fierce effort was straight down Howard's throat.

And so to penalties. We were cheered by the choice to take the penalties in front of the United fans, with West Ham kicking first.

Noble 1-0: decent penalty low to Howard's left, atoning for his dreadful miss against Spurs
Davies 1-1: excellent penalty into the top right corner
Downing 2-1: decent shot low to Howard's right but the keeper might feel he could have stopped it, given that he got a hand to it
Collins 2-2: followed Davies in putting his penalty in the top corner
Zarate 3-2: cracking penalty. Powerful shot into the roof of the net, absolutely no chance for Howard
McNulty 3-3: Jääskeläinen got fingers to the shot but couldn't stop it down to his left
Poyet 4-3: sent Howard the wrong way and rolled it in
McEverley 4-4: into the side netting inside the left post, no chance for Jääskeläinen
Valencia 4-4: poor, poor penalty, straight down the middle and as easy a stop as Howard could have hoped for
Doyle 4-5: converted with ease into the bottom left, sparking wild celebrations from the Unitedites.

Overall thoughts
West Ham's players were better than ours. Bigger, stronger, quicker, better first touch...but they didn't play as a team and didn't have a clue how to break us down. Other than Valencia's miss in the first half I'm struggling to think of a clear cut opportunity that they created.

Once again, though, we conceded a soft, soft goal. It was a nothing ball that Collins (I think) should have dealt with but Sakho got a yard and was able to flick over a stranded Howard. After defending relatively well that could have been a hammer blow.

We equalised fortuitously but then held out and rightly asked West Ham to break us down. Even throwing on their better players didn't help with Downing and Zarate looking lively but only forcing one decent save out of Howard.

We desperately need a mobile centre forward. I like McNulty's attitude but I feel he's like a League One Billy Sharp - no outstanding attribute at this level to play in this team. Maybe if we start putting the ball at his feet 10 yards out he'll start scoring but we're not getting to the byline to get those cut-backs working.

Defensively I thought Doyle and Basham had good games, getting in West Ham's faces and denying them space. West Ham lacked experience in the centre of the park and we were able to exploit that - the fact that Morrison starting picking the ball up next to his centre halves tells you what a good job Doyle and Basham were doing. Alcock was outstanding, linking up well with Davies and keeping a very good opponent in Diamé quiet.

Ratings:
Howard 8.5
: this might seem harsh but there were two spilled shots which, on another night, could have cost us. The saves from Valencia in the first half and Downing in the second half were outstanding, however; and the penalty save was the icing on the MOTM cake.
Alcock 8: solid defensively and still had the energy to make 70 yard dashes in the second half of extra time. BladeInThatcham made the point that we've been lucky with our right backs in recent years...then we remembered McMahon.
McGahey 8: grew into the game. Solid as West Ham didn't exploit his weakness, judging high balls. I'm firmly on the side that believes that he's going to be a very good centre half.
Collins 7: see McGahey with a lost mark for losing Sakho.
Harris 7: did well; didn't get forward as much as Alcock but this wasn't a game for both full backs to be bombing on
Davies 7: not the quickest so not keen to take on the inexperienced Potts at full back but used the ball well
Basham 7: weird one. He's been tasked with being the more advanced central midfielder but I'm not sure he's got the technique to do that role. Defensively and positionally excellent, however.
Doyle 7.5: this is the sort of game that Doyle thrives in. Letting West Ham have the ball and staying solid meant that his weakness (mobility) was negated and his strength (getting stuck in) could be utilised. Not a player for an open game.
Flynn 6: didn't really get into the game at all; outmuscled by Demel pretty much whenever he got the ball
Baxter 6: not really sure where Baxter was supposed to be playing but he ended up trying to be a deep lying playmaker, with the lack of movement in front of him meaning that wasn't really an option. He also needs to get on the ball more as if he goes without it for a couple of minutes, he normally loses it when he does get it.
McNulty 5: see above. I want it to work out for McNulty but he's not got the strength, pace or movement to cause issues at this level on the evidence so far.

Subs:
McEverley (for Harris) 7: up against Downing who's better than his reputation would have you believe. Will prove to be a very good signing for us despite the initial doubts.
Campbell-Ryce (for Flynn) 7: full of running and caused more problems in 40 minutes than Flynn did in 80
Wallace (for Baxter) n/a: on for 20 minutes in extra time

Clough 8: got the tactics spot on. We looked like a team, they didn't

West Ham 5: looked like a collection of individuals without a clue how to break us down. I'd be surprised if Allardyce sees out the season.

Fans 8: fewer fans at West Ham than at Peterborough the week before tells you where our priorities are; that said, the 900 seemed to outsing the 28,000 home fans.
Excellent report, there were 1,400 Blades there tonight though, couple of hundred more than at Peterborough, class following for a Tuesday night in London in the 2nd round of the cup.
 
Good report, I agree with most except I think you were a bit harsh on Baxter. Thought he was excellent last night, always showing for the ball and trying to keep things moving. Admittedly he got deeper and deeper as the game went on and probably stayed on a bit too long in the end but was one of our better players in my opinion.
 
Good report, I agree with most except I think you were a bit harsh on Baxter. Thought he was excellent last night, always showing for the ball and trying to keep things moving. Admittedly he got deeper and deeper as the game went on and probably stayed on a bit too long in the end but was one of our better players in my opinion.

Fair enough. I agree but as he got starved of the ball he started losing it whenever he did get it. I thought it quite interesting that both Baxter and Morrison - ostensibly #10s - both dropped deeper and deeper to get the ball but for completely different reasons.

Don't forget that thanks to West Ham's chaotic approach to ticketing I missed most of the first half so probably missed much of Baxter's good work... :)

Excellent report, there were 1,400 Blades there tonight though, couple of hundred more than at Peterborough, class following for a Tuesday night in London in the 2nd round of the cup.

My mistake, I'd heard 900 before the game. 1,400 is a good effort all things considered (mainly United misjudging the demand and putting such punitive restrictions on)
 
It was McGahey who lost the header to the lad that scored, not Collo. Soft goal to concede, though

Good report otherwise - bit harsh on Baxter, Doyle and McNuts IMO - thought Nuts worked his bollox off in that role and always showed to receive the ball - he is still a youngster but showed guts and determination throughout.

Also Davies was way better than a 7 - the quality of balls into the area from him was excellent and he worked really well with Alcock on that right hand side
 
Bit harsh on McNulty I feel who worked very hard, up front on his own against a big defence. I think when we attacked he made intelligent runs: the goal, for example, although lucky, was made by such a run and it was his assist as he got a flick on the ball before Reid turned it in.

Davies I'd mark higher too, great fitness, some good deliveries and a nerveless penalty that set the tone for us to win the shootout.
 
Bit harsh on McNulty I feel who worked very hard, up front on his own against a big defence. I think when we attacked he made intelligent runs: the goal, for example, although lucky, was made by such a run and it was his assist as he got a flick on the ball before Reid turned it in.

Davies I'd mark higher too, great fitness, some good deliveries and a nerveless penalty that set the tone for us to win the shootout.

Agree - without McNuts headed flick on the ball in from from Harris it would not have struck Reid on the shin and bobbled, deliciously past the stranded, hapless, Jääskeläinen - bwahahahahahahaha
 
Have you got a thing against McNulty? The lad worked his bollocks off, making run after run (most of which ended without a pass to him) trying to create space and offer the outlet which we needed. Without that we would have been overwhelmed last night. Best outfield performance of the night for us IMO.
 
We desperately need a mobile centre forward. I like McNulty's attitude but I feel he's like a League One Billy Sharp - no outstanding attribute at this level to play in this team. Maybe if we start putting the ball at his feet 10 yards out he'll start scoring but we're not getting to the byline to get those cut-backs working.

Give McNulty time, I believe Murphy plays a vital role in getting the ball and taking it to the byline to cut-back for players like McNulty, Higdon, Baxter and Scougall... Same with Flynn, Davies and JCR.

McNulty will grow into the season, Scougall didn't make an immediate impact.
 
It was McGahey who lost the header to the lad that scored, not Collo. Soft goal to concede, though

Good report otherwise - bit harsh on Baxter, Doyle and McNuts IMO - thought Nuts worked his bollox off in that role and always showed to receive the ball - he is still a youngster but showed guts and determination throughout.

Also Davies was way better than a 7 - the quality of balls into the area from him was excellent and he worked really well with Alcock on that right hand side

I thought it was McGahey when watching the half time highlights but the goal came down the left channel - which is Collins' territory. McGahey and Collins got in a real mess for 15 seconds and West Ham punished us.

Bit harsh on McNulty I feel who worked very hard, up front on his own against a big defence. I think when we attacked he made intelligent runs: the goal, for example, although lucky, was made by such a run and it was his assist as he got a flick on the ball before Reid turned it in.

Davies I'd mark higher too, great fitness, some good deliveries and a nerveless penalty that set the tone for us to win the shootout.

Kenners I understand where you're coming from on Baxter - addressed above, I thought he faded out of the game - but while McNulty did some good work without the ball he didn't use it well when he did get it and the tactic of backing into Reid then falling over was laughable. I thought Davies did well but it's all relative: I don't think there were any 9 out of 10 performances individually and Davies, Doyle and Baxter weren't our best players, hence their marks. I would say that the team performance gets a 9 from me!

Give McNulty time, I believe Murphy plays a vital role in getting the ball and taking it to the byline to cut-back for players like McNulty, Higdon, Baxter and Scougall... Same with Flynn, Davies and JCR.

McNulty will grow into the season, Scougall didn't make an immediate impact.

Agreed - if we're going to play McNulty then there's no point expecting him to run 20 yards with the ball at his feet then curl it into the top corner from the edge of the area. He's a poacher, we need to get him running onto cutbacks from the byline - think McDonald's goal against Notts County at the start of last season.

You can add Basham to that list of players for the pull backs too - his timing of his runs into the area is very good, he should have scored at Peterborough after some excellent work (somewhat ironically, given what I've written above) from McNulty.
 
The great thing about last night was that it was a collectively good performance rather than one or two here or there. Flynn was always going to struggle against Demel though, the guy is huge.

We were obviously under pressure for much of the game but we made it very difficult for them. It was good to see how much we grew after our goal, we played some really nice stuff and kept the ball well. We need to take this momentum into another extremely difficult game on Saturday,

When you look at the shot count, it looks like they've murdered us. I'd like to see the chance count though, because the amount of long range efforts they had were ridiculous. Most saves from Howard were routine apart from two or three good saves and one world class save from the deflected (and guess what, long range) shot.

Also, nobody has mentioned him yet as far as I can see, but the ref James Linington last night had an excellent game. He didn't fall for the dives, got all the big decisions right and overall ran the game well whilst keeping his cards in his pocket. I know everyone jumps on their back when they have a bad game so I'd like to give one some credit for a change.
 

Good report Balham Blade, agree with a good bit of that!

I think the bit that hits the nail on the head is that once again we looked like a team, the understanding was obviously there, we had our game plan and whilst we didn't really offer shed loads going forward I think we did what was set out in the changing room before the game. West ham on the other hand looked a bit like us at times over the last few years in the sense that they appeared to be trying to try play football on the deck as opposed to the route one game that they had all been used to, at times they managed it but weren't consistent or comfortable in doing so.

If the players put in a shift and you still lose then you can accept it and move on from it as much as it hurts you to lose. The whole team put in a shift last night and one thing that stood out for me and made me feel proud is how much the players wanted to be on the pitch and win the game, whether that was for personal reasons or for the clubwho knows? I would like to think a bit of both but if they consistently play like that week in week out I don't really care. The back four deserve a mention, the amount of times players threw themselves in front of the ball was unreal, block after block, tackle after tackle. The determination was unreal.

I have to say that I have absolutely fallen in love with Craig Alcock now! That lad gets better game after game, what a grafter he is! He is turning out to be a right steal. When I heard about McEveley signing for us I have to admit to not being overly blown away but he isn't looking too bad either. I have knock McGahey in the past as well but he was class as well.
 
Good report but;
Collins not at fault for the goal and he had the best game I've seen him play in a blades shirt; 9
Mcnulty had a fine game given he's a young lad and asked to play up top on his own, held it up well, ran his blood to water, played on opponents shoulders looking for the channels, 8
Flynn, weak link 5
Fans, good 1300-400 and quality backing with some good wit and banter
 
once again we looked like a team, the understanding was obviously there, we had our game plan and whilst we didn't really offer shed loads going forward

These sort of games are ideal for us.

We are a better side soaking it up and hitting on the break. Whilst this is very unpalatable at BDTBL against Division 3 teams, it is more than acceptable against top flight and Championship opposition. They are also likely to "indulge us" because they are supposed to roll us over and their crowd aren't going to be happy if they don't.
Although I didn't go it certainly sounded to have the feel of Villa Park last season. At that time we hadn't got the side 100% settled in (still had McMahon for Gods sake, sorry Sitters) but "the plan" was starting to show and when the players were fully in place it came to fruition.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom