him behind you
Active Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2010
- Messages
- 1,440
- Reaction score
- 2,377
Something I've noted recently so just thought I'd raise this for discussion - if anyone else is interested.
When we appointed NA, I seem to remember a Southampton fan (I think it was) coming on here and basically telling us something alone the lines of we'd got a cracking manager but we might get a bit tired of his interviews because he often says the same thing in them.
I'm sure most of us will have seen that given the level of interest and the number of posts we were all involved with regarding managers at the time and none of us gave a damn because we were just happy with the appointment.
One question I would ask, therefore, is "Why do so many of us now pick on this trait and moan about him when things aren't going well?" For me, there are more important things to worry about such as poor performances, motivation and mental strength of certain individuals etc. we could complain about and question rather than picking on personal traits which is really just taking the piss out of him isn't it?
We were warned what we'd get and personally I would prefer this with better on field entertainment (which admittedly is still work in progress) than the NC approach which I thought were more interesting interviews but damn awful performances to watch.
Anyone have any thoughts?
When we appointed NA, I seem to remember a Southampton fan (I think it was) coming on here and basically telling us something alone the lines of we'd got a cracking manager but we might get a bit tired of his interviews because he often says the same thing in them.
I'm sure most of us will have seen that given the level of interest and the number of posts we were all involved with regarding managers at the time and none of us gave a damn because we were just happy with the appointment.
One question I would ask, therefore, is "Why do so many of us now pick on this trait and moan about him when things aren't going well?" For me, there are more important things to worry about such as poor performances, motivation and mental strength of certain individuals etc. we could complain about and question rather than picking on personal traits which is really just taking the piss out of him isn't it?
We were warned what we'd get and personally I would prefer this with better on field entertainment (which admittedly is still work in progress) than the NC approach which I thought were more interesting interviews but damn awful performances to watch.
Anyone have any thoughts?